Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reconnecting interpretation to reasoning through individual differences.

Keith Stenning1, Richard Cox

  • 1Edinburgh University, Scotland, UK. k.stenning@ed.ac.uk

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|July 19, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving Immunization Rates Through Community-Based Participatory Research: Community Health Improvement for Milwaukee's Children Program.

Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action·2016
Same author

Reasoning, logic, and psychology.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science·2015
Same author

The empirical study of norms is just what we are missing.

Frontiers in psychology·2014
Same author

Calculating alcohol risk in a visualization tool for promoting healthy behavior.

Patient education and counseling·2013
Same author

QSAR workbench: automating QSAR modeling to drive compound design.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2013
Same author

To naturalize or not to naturalize? An issue for cognitive science as well as anthropology.

Topics in cognitive science·2012

This study reveals that how people interpret information in reasoning tasks depends on context. Understanding these interpretation patterns is key to explaining differences in deductive reasoning performance.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Computational theories of mind posit information interpretation precedes reasoning.
  • Previous research indicated differing interpretations of premises in immediate vs. syllogistic reasoning tasks.
  • Gricean implicatures alone have not reconciled these interpretation differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reconcile differing interpretations of premises in deductive reasoning tasks.
  • To explore how credulous discourse processing and information packaging influence interpretation.
  • To investigate the continuity of interpretation across immediate and syllogistic reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Exploratory experimental design.
  • Investigated immediate inference and subsequent syllogistic reasoning tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed interpretation patterns based on credulity and reliance on information packaging.

    • Main Results:

    • Systematic interpretation patterns were identified, driven by credulity and information packaging.
    • These patterns transcended specific quantifier inferences.
    • Interpretation differences directly influenced subsequent syllogistic reasoning outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Participants' understanding of deductive tasks often diverges from experimental intentions.
    • Continuity of interpretation is achievable through a broad Gricean framework of credulous discourse processing.
    • Human reasoning is not monolithic; expect variety rather than a single fundamental mechanism.