Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2026

An Ultrasonic Tool for Nerve Conduction Block in Diabetic Rat Models
Published on: October 20, 2017
A method to estimate the depth of the sciatic nerve during subgluteal block by using thigh diameter as a guide
Eric C Crabtree1, Marc Beck, Brian R Lopp
1Regional Anesthesia Study Center of Iowa, Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Background And Objective:
The subgluteal approach is common for sciatic nerve block. Although the surface landmarks are clear, the depth of this nerve at this level is difficult to judge. The purpose of this study is to establish a method of estimating the sciatic nerve depth using the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the thigh as a marker.
Methods:
The study was undertaken in 2 phases. Phase 1 entailed review of 100 magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the pelvis and proximal lower extremity of patients. Measurements were taken of the AP diameter of the thigh at the midpoint of the lesser trochanter and then compared with distances of the sciatic nerves from the skin of the posterior aspect of the thigh at the same level. Phase 2 involved enrolling 40 patients undergoing lower-extremity surgery for whom subgluteal sciatic nerve blocks were indicated. The AP diameters of the thighs were measured from the subgluteal groove to the inguinal groove with the patient in the supine position. Placing the patient in the lateral position, the subgluteal sciatic block was then performed by using a stimulating needle. The distances from the skin at which the sciatic nerves were actually found, as estimated by maximum motor response to stimulus, were noted.
Results:
Phase 1 showed a mean AP diameter of 18.94 cm +/- 2.61 cm (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]), mean nerve depth of 6.51 cm +/- 1.46 cm (mean +/- SD), and a linear regression slope of 0.48. Phase 2 showed a mean AP diameter of 16.28 cm +/- 2.73 cm (mean +/- SD), a mean nerve depth of 6.99 cm +/- 1.39 cm (mean +/- SD), and a linear regression slope of 0.43. The thigh diameters differed (P < .001) between the groups, but there was no difference in the depth to the sciatic nerve between the 2 groups (P = .07).
Conclusions:
Comparing phase 1 and phase 2 datasets shows the slopes of linear regression lines are nearly parallel. The clinical data from phase 2 verify the anatomical data collected in phase 1 and show that the sciatic nerve depth to AP diameter ratio is 0.43 or the depth of the sciatic nerve is approximately 43% of thigh diameter if the patient is positioned in the lateral decubitus position.
More Related Videos
08:16Partial Sciatic Nerve Ligation: A Mouse Model of Chronic Neuropathic Pain to Study the Antinociceptive Effect of Novel Therapies
Published on: October 6, 2022
08:20Efficacy of Fu's Subcutaneous Needling on Sciatic Nerve Pain: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Changes in a Chronic Constriction Injury Rat Model
Published on: June 30, 2023