Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evolution and the American social sciences: An evolutionary social scientist's view.

Bradley A Thayer1

  • 1Department of Defense and Strategic Studies, Missouri State University, Hunter's Branch, 9302 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22031, USA. brt868f@smsu.edu.

Politics and the Life Sciences : the Journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
|July 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary

American social scientists underutilize evolutionary concepts due to political liberalism, fear of Social Darwinism, and critiques of evolutionary theory. Encouraging evolutionary social science requires better education and refuting misconceptions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The evolution of offensive realism.

Politics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences·2016
Same author

Biopolitics and international security studies.

Politics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences·2010
Same author

Considering population and war: a critical and neglected aspect of conflict studies.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2009
Same author

Drivers of violent conflict.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2007

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • American social scientists infrequently integrate evolutionary concepts into behavioral analysis.
  • This underuse hinders the potential of evolutionary theory to address significant social issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify key barriers preventing the adoption of evolutionary concepts in American social sciences.
  • To propose actionable strategies for increasing the integration of evolutionary perspectives in social science research and education.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the historical and philosophical underpinnings of social science.
  • Argumentation based on identifying and refuting common criticisms of evolutionary theory in social contexts.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Three primary obstacles identified: ideologically constrained political liberalism, fear of "Social Darwinism," and perceived deterministic/reductionistic nature of evolutionary thinking.
  • Four solutions proposed: enhanced education, public refutation of criticisms, demonstrating evolutionary theory's explanatory power for social behavior, and acknowledging the long-term nature of scientific paradigm shifts.

Conclusions:

  • Overcoming barriers requires proactive engagement from evolutionary social scientists.
  • Effective communication and education are crucial for integrating evolutionary perspectives into mainstream social science.
  • Evolutionary theory offers a robust framework for understanding social behavior, surpassing individual-level theories.