Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lightness, illumination, and gradients.

Dejan Todorović1

  • 1Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Belgrade, Cika Ljubina 18-20, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia. dtodorov@dekart.f.bg.ac.yu

Spatial Vision
|July 26, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Mainz-Linez Illusion.

i-Perception·2025
Same author

Exploring the Efficiency of Magnetic Separation and Gravity Concentration for Valorizing Pb-Zn Smelter Slag in a Circular Economy Framework.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Extension of a computational model of a class of orientation illusions.

Vision research·2024
Same author

The inner tube effect.

i-Perception·2024
Same author

The rocking line illusion.

i-Perception·2023
Same author

Ultra-sensitive graphene membranes for microphone applications.

Nanoscale·2023
Same journal

Comment on 'angle illusion on a picture's surface' by Hammad et al. (2008).

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial distance between target and irrelevant patch modulates detection in a texture segmentation task.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Inhibition related impairments of coherent motion perception in the attention-induced motion blindness paradigm.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Recognition units in reading: backward masking experiments.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial-temporal modeling of interactive image interpretation.

Spatial vision·2009
See all related articles

Lightness illusions challenge the illumination interpretation approach by showing effects not explained by lightness constancy mechanisms. Control displays and gradient effects reveal limitations in current models of visual perception.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Perception
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • The illumination interpretation approach explains lightness illusions via misapplied lightness constancy mechanisms.
  • These mechanisms typically extract surface reflectance by discounting illumination cues, like luminance gradients.
  • Luminance gradients are believed to signal light-surface interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the illumination interpretation approach for explaining lightness illusions.
  • To present evidence, including control displays and novel stimuli, that challenge this approach.
  • To explore the influence of luminance gradients on perceived lightness and uniform regions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of established lightness illusions through the lens of illumination interpretation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Presentation of control displays with equivalent lightness effects unexplained by the approach.
  • Introduction of novel visual stimuli demonstrating gradient effects on uniform regions.
  • Discussion of neural simulations modeling luminance distribution effects.

    • Main Results:

    • Control displays produced similar lightness effects that could not be readily explained by illumination interpretation.
    • Luminance gradients were shown to influence the qualitative appearance of uniform regions in novel ways.
    • Existing models based on illumination interpretation appear insufficient to account for all observed lightness phenomena.

    Conclusions:

    • The illumination interpretation approach has limitations in fully explaining lightness illusions and visual perception.
    • Further research is needed to refine models of how the visual system processes luminance and illumination cues.
    • Novel stimuli and control experiments are crucial for advancing our understanding of visual processing and illusions.