Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response surface optimization for joint contact model evaluation.

Yi-Chung Lin1, Jack Farr, Kevin Carter

  • 1Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Journal of Applied Biomechanics
|July 28, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of Prior Hamstring Strain Injury on Muscle Morphology and Sprinting Biomechanics in Collegiate American Football Athletes.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2026
Same author

Running Speed is Maximized by Strengthening the Hip Flexors and Hip Adductors.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

Hip Joint Loading During Walking Is Associated With Cartilage Defect Severity in Young Adult Football Players With Hip/Groin Pain.

Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society·2026
Same author

Generic versus personalized foot-ground contact models for predictive simulations of walking: Is personalization worth the effort?

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Reproducible Research: Computational Design of Personalized Clinical Treatments for Walking Impairments Using the Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling Pipeline.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Comparison Between Performance of Disease-Specific and Region-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Adolescents After Patellofemoral Stabilization Surgery: Data From the JUPITER Cohort.

The American journal of sports medicine·2026
Same journal

The Influence of Different Starting Block Distances on Internal Tibial Load in Elite Sprinters.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Altered Lower-Limb Dynamics in Stop-Jump Activity of Adolescents With Major Thoracic Scoliosis.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical Differences During Overground Walking in Virtual Reality: A Comparative Study With a Real Environment.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

The Influence of Relative Schoolbag Mass on Gait Biomechanics of South African Adolescents: The Role of Sex and Grade.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Influence of Body Configuration on Kinetics and Multijoint Control Strategies Sprinters Use During the First Step Out of Blocks.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Assessing the Validity of Whole-Body and Segmental Angular Momenta During Walking in Older Individuals With and Without Transtibial Limb Loss.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a faster method for evaluating joint contact models using response surface optimization. The new approach significantly reduces computational cost while maintaining accuracy for contact force and area predictions.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Computational modeling
  • Optimization

Background:

  • Evaluating joint contact models is computationally expensive.
  • High computational cost limits the use of optimization for model validation.
  • Discrete element contact models require repeated analysis for parameter evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computationally efficient methodology for joint contact model evaluation.
  • To address the limitation of high computational cost in contact analysis.
  • To improve the optimization process for reproducing experimental measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a response surface optimization methodology using quadratic response surfaces.
  • Fit response surfaces to contact quantities (force, pressure, area) from a discrete element contact model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Used response surfaces as surrogates for contact analyses in optimization.

    • Main Results:

    • Response surface optimization achieved high accuracy for synthetic data (within 3.4% error).
    • Experimental data showed good agreement (within 6.3% error) for most quantities.
    • Maximum contact pressure showed higher error (up to 50%) in the experimental case.

    Conclusions:

    • Response surface optimization offers a computationally efficient way to evaluate joint contact models.
    • The method is effective within a limited range of relative bone poses.
    • It can aid in identifying weaknesses in contact models or experimental data quality.