Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026
05:10
An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System
Published on: March 17, 2023
Should we use criteria or eyeballing to reject post-interruption tracings?
Rebekka Veugelers1, Corine Penning, Stefan P J Grootscholten
1Intellectual Disability Medicine, Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pediatric Pulmonology
|July 28, 2006
Summary
Objective criteria for analyzing interrupter resistance (Rint) measurements were developed to standardize practice. These criteria simplify decision-making without significantly altering outcome values, improving Rint technique reliability.
Area of Science:
- Respiratory Mechanics
- Pulmonary Function Testing
- Medical Device Analysis
Background:
- Interrupter resistance (Rint) measurements are crucial for assessing respiratory mechanics.
- Current rejection of post-interruption tracings relies on subjective visual assessment of pressure-time and flow-time curves.
- Lack of objective criteria hinders standardization and introduces variability in Rint analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To formulate explicit, objective rejection criteria for post-interruption tracings in Rint measurements.
- To compare the agreement and impact of these criteria against current subjective "eyeballing" methods.
- To enhance the standardization and simplify daily decision-making in Rint analysis.
Main Methods:
- Developed explicit rejection criteria for post-interruption tracings based on curve patterns.
- Compared inter-observer agreement between the new criteria and subjective "eyeballing".
- Analyzed 54 measurements (807 interruptions) from children with severe neurological impairment.
Main Results:
- Inter-observer agreement was similar for both criteria and eyeballing (85.6% vs. 82.8%).
- The criteria led to higher rejection of individual interruptions (43.4% vs. 29.8%) but similar discarding of total measurements.
- Outcome values remained comparable across all rejection methods, including no rejection.
Conclusions:
- Explicit rejection criteria for Rint post-interruption tracings were successfully developed.
- These criteria can standardize Rint technique and simplify analysis without compromising outcome values.
- The developed criteria offer a more objective approach to Rint data analysis in clinical practice.
