Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution.

Anjali Goswami1

  • 1Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago Illinois 60637, USA. a.goswami@nhm.ac.uk

The American Naturalist
|July 29, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A second theropod tooth from the Cauvery Basin reaffirms the presence of troodontid dinosaurs in the Cretaceous of India.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026
Same author

Evaluating the Efficacy of EcoSAFE: A Superoxidized Solution With HOCl at Neutral pH for Infection Control.

Cureus·2026
Same author

A suture in time: The ontogeny of cranial suture morphology in mammals.

Journal of anatomy·2025
Same author

Assessing the application of landmark-free morphometrics to macroevolutionary analyses.

BMC ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Divergent patterns of cranial suture fusion in marsupial and placental mammals.

Zoological journal of the Linnean Society·2025
Same author

Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Among Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in North Bihar and Missed Opportunities for Early Diagnosis.

Cureus·2025

Mammalian skull modularity is conserved in therian mammals but differs from monotremes. Cranial bone integration is influenced by shared function, tissue origin, and ossification mode.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Comparative anatomy
  • Morphological integration

Background:

  • Skull components studied separately for decades.
  • Modularity offers a quantitative approach to studying correlated traits.
  • Few studies compare modularity across higher taxa for evolutionary significance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Analyze phenotypic modularity in mammalian crania across diverse species.
  • Compare cranial modularity between therian (marsupials, placentals) and monotreme mammals.
  • Investigate functional and developmental influences on cranial bone integration.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized 18-32 three-dimensional cranial landmarks.
  • Analyzed phenotypic modularity in 106 mammalian species.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performed cluster analyses to identify cranial modules.

    • Main Results:

    • Cranial modularity is generally conserved within therian mammals.
    • Significant differences in cranial modularity exist between therians and monotremes.
    • Therians show six distinct modules (three highly integrated), while monotremes have two highly integrated modules.
    • Theoretical models of function, tissue origin, and ossification correlate with observed cranial integration.

    Conclusions:

    • Mammalian cranial modularity shows evolutionary conservation within therians but divergence from monotremes.
    • Functional and developmental factors significantly influence cranial bone integration patterns.
    • Modularity analysis provides insights into the evolution of mammalian skull structure.