Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Operating room debriefings.

Martin A Makary1, Christine G Holzmueller, J Bryan Sexton

  • 1Department of Surgery, The John Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA. mmakary1@jhmi.edu

Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
|August 4, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-Reported Flourishing Among U.S. Surgeons: A National Physician Survey.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same author

Implementing a Patient-Centered Education Bundle to Improve Venous Thromboembolism Prevention.

JAMA surgery·2025
Same author

Individual vs societal perspectives: implications on quantitative benefit-risk assessment of vaccination.

Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research·2025
Same author

Bite-sized self-compassion: a pilot cohort study of a well-being tool for healthcare workers.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Health-State Utility Values for Infectious Diseases With Pandemic Potential and Associated Vaccine Adverse Reactions.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2025
Same author

Single cell analysis identifies distinct CD4 + T cells associated with the pathobiology of pediatric obesity related asthma.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Implementing the SSKIN Bundle in Home Healthcare: A Tool Tutorial for Reducing Pressure Injuries.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026
Same journal

How Collaboration Between Surgeons and Medical Oncologists Affects Outcomes for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026
Same journal

Uneven Compassion and the Emotional Safety of the Healthcare Workforce.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026
Same journal

Development and Implementation of a Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Surgical Case Duration.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026
Same journal

Decreasing Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Testing Turnaround Time for Infants in a Hospital Setting: A Continuous Quality Improvement Project.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026
Same journal

Symptom Tracking in Primary Care: Designing and Testing an EHR-Embedded Safety-Net System.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026
See all related articles

This tool aids in evaluating operational factors. It identifies elements that contributed to adverse events, near misses, or inefficiencies in procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Operations
  • Patient Safety Analysis

Background:

  • Adverse events and inefficiencies pose significant risks in healthcare operations.
  • Understanding contributing factors is crucial for improving procedural outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a tool for assessing factors influencing operational events.
  • To systematically analyze positive and negative contributors to adverse events, near misses, and inefficiencies.

Main Methods:

  • The tool facilitates a structured assessment of procedural events.
  • It allows for the identification and categorization of contributing factors.

Main Results:

  • The assessment tool provides insights into the root causes of operational failures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It highlights key factors that either prevented or led to adverse outcomes.

    • Conclusions:

    • This assessment tool can enhance the analysis of operational performance.
    • It supports the development of targeted interventions to improve safety and efficiency.