Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Development of a clinical chart audit programme.

Y Zissiadis1, E Harper, C Harper

  • 1Perth Radiation Oncology Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. Yvonne.Zissiadis@health.wa.gov.au

Australasian Radiology
|August 4, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Drug prevalence in Canadian driving population.

Traffic injury prevention·2025
Same author

Accurate activity determination of a californium neutron source.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2023
Same author

The Financial Impact on Reimbursement of Moderately Hypofractionated Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer: An International Consortium Report.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2020
Same author

Retrospective cohort study of 925 OAGB procedures. The UK MGB/OAGB collaborative group.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2019
Same author

Is it Time to Change Radiotherapy: The Dawning of Chronoradiotherapy?

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2019
Same author

Experiences of using very low energy diets for weight loss by people with overweight or obesity: a review of qualitative research.

Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity·2018
Same journal

Percutaneous biliary internal decompression in a patient with simultaneous malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction and surgically modified anatomy.

Australasian radiology·2008
Same journal

Fluoromethylcholine PET in recurrent multifocal hepatoma.

Australasian radiology·2008
Same journal

Patent urachus in a neonate: findings at micturating cystourethregram.

Australasian radiology·2008
Same journal

Combined treatment of ablative therapy with percutaneous radiofrequency and cementoplasty of a symptomatic metastatic lesion of the acetabulum.

Australasian radiology·2007
Same journal

Basilar artery aneurysm treated with coil embolization via persistent primitive hypoglossal artery.

Australasian radiology·2007
Same journal

Emergency embolization of multiple splenic artery pseudoaneurysms associated with portal hypertension complicating cystic fibrosis.

Australasian radiology·2007
See all related articles

A new radiation oncology chart review tool improved communication quality and patient care. This objective program enhanced chart accuracy and reliability for both radical and palliative treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Radiation oncology charts are crucial for patient care communication.
  • Clear, precise, and accurate charting is paramount for effective radiation therapy delivery.
  • Quality assurance programs should include regular chart audits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and assess an objective, quantitative program for reviewing radiation oncology charts.
  • To improve communication quality and patient management through enhanced chart review.
  • To compare charts of radically treated versus palliatively treated patients.

Main Methods:

  • A pilot study was conducted over 8 months using a newly developed chart review tool.
  • Monthly assessments were performed on a 25% sample of treatment charts (156 total).

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study included both radical (56%) and palliative (44%) treatment cases.

    • Main Results:

    • Overall mean chart scores significantly improved over the study period (P < 0.001).
    • Individual radiation oncologists' scores also showed improvement.
    • High reliability was demonstrated (intra-rater alpha=0.99, inter-rater alpha=0.88).

    Conclusions:

    • The developed chart review program is an easy-to-use and reliable tool.
    • The program positively influenced the standard of radiation oncology charts.
    • Objective chart review enhances communication and patient management in radiation oncology.