Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Scientific misconduct and science ethics: a case study based approach.

Luca Consoli1

  • 1Institute for Science, Innovation and Society (ISIS), Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands. l.consoli@science.ru.nl

Science and Engineering Ethics
|August 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary

The Schön case reveals systemic issues in scientific ethics and practice. It highlights how daily scientific activities and co-authorship definitions create ethical challenges for researchers.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How to communicate and what to disclose to participants in a recall-by-genotype research approach: a multistep empirical study.

Journal of community genetics·2024
Same author

Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2022
Same author

Suggestions to Improve the Comprehensibility of Current Definitions of Scientific Authorship for International Authors.

Science and engineering ethics·2019
Same author

Denying Darwin: Views on science in the rejection of evolution by Dutch Protestants.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2013
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Science Ethics
  • Philosophy of Science

Background:

  • The widely publicized Schön misconduct case prompted discussions on science ethics.
  • The official investigation report presents a complex ethical and philosophical scenario.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Analyze the Schön case to reveal underlying ethical and philosophical questions.
  • Examine the impact of daily scientific practices on assessing misconduct.
  • Critique the practical application of co-authorship definitions.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of the Schön investigation report.
  • Examination of scientific practices and their ethical implications.
  • Critique of co-authorship definitions in scientific research.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The Schön case exemplifies chronic problems embedded in daily scientific practices.
  • Standard definitions of co-authorship are problematic in practical application.
  • Scientists' self-reflection on moral and methodological aspects is crucial.

Conclusions:

  • Scientific method and ethics are intrinsically linked.
  • Improved self-reflection by scientists can enhance both scientific achievements and ethical assessments.
  • Addressing systemic issues in scientific practice is vital for maintaining research integrity.