Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Field Collection and Laboratory Maintenance of Canopy-Forming Giant Kelp to Facilitate Restoration
Published on: June 7, 2024
Gaps and mismatches between global conservation priorities and spending
Benjamin S Halpern1, Christopher R Pyke, Helen E Fox
1National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, 735 State Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, USA. balpern@nceas.ucsb.edu
Global conservation priority maps show limited influence on organizational spending. A review of five organizations found that while priority areas received more funding, the maps explained only a small fraction of expenditures, indicating potential inefficiencies.
Area of Science:
- Conservation Science
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Environmental Economics
Background:
- International conservation organizations increasingly use global priority maps to direct conservation efforts and funding.
- A lack of financial tracking by organizations with priority models prevents direct evaluation of their influence on spending.
- Previous assessments of conservation spending have not systematically audited global patterns relative to stated priorities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the spending patterns of five major biodiversity conservation organizations lacking published global priority models.
- To investigate the extent to which global priority maps influence conservation expenditure.
- To identify potential gaps and mismatches in global conservation spending.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of conservation spending data from five large biodiversity conservation organizations.
- Comparison of spending patterns against existing global conservation priority areas.
- Statistical analysis to determine the proportion of spending explained by priority models, with adjustments for country wealth (GDP per capita) and the inclusion/exclusion of the United States.
Main Results:
- Countries with designated priority areas generally received higher conservation investments.
- Global prioritization systems explained only 2-32% of the analyzed US$1.5 billion in conservation spending in 2002.
- Limited overlap was observed in the spending patterns of the evaluated organizations, suggesting uncoordinated or segregated efforts.
Conclusions:
- Global priority maps have a modest influence on conservation spending, with significant portions of funds allocated outside these priorities.
- There is a need for greater transparency in priority setting by organizations without current models and improved spending tracking by those with models.
- Enhanced clarity and tracking are crucial for optimizing the efficiency of limited conservation funds and improving global conservation outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Declining Populations
Habitat Fragmentation
Sustainable Development
What is Conservation Biology?
Threats to Biodiversity
Conservation of Small Populations