Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
How we do it: analysing GP referral priorities: the unforeseen effect of 'Choose and Book'
D D Pothier1, C Repanos, Z Awad
1Department of Otolaryngology, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath, UK. email@davepothier.com
Abstract:
The introduction of Choose and Book may have a significant effect on the proportion of urgent referrals seen by ENT surgeons. Much of the responsibility for prioritisation will be transferred to the GP. Patients who are considered urgent by the ENT surgeon will be added to those considered urgent by the GP. Our results show that there was little agreement between GPs and ENT surgeon on what constitutes an urgent referral. The combined effect of joint prioritisation and the removal of the 'soon' category resulted in a 270% increase in 'urgent' referrals in our sample. This potentially unforeseen consequence of the Choose and Book system should be taken into consideration by ENT departments to allow for an expansion of the 'urgent' category.
Related Concept Videos
Planning Nursing Care I
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Framing Effects
