Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Minimal Invasive Surgical Procedure of Inducing Myocardial Infarction in Mice
Published on: May 4, 2015
[Bundle-branch block in the course of myocardial infarction. Recent advances]
Insights
Right bundle-branch block (RBBB) in anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) increases mortality risk. New left bundle-branch block (LBBB) after STEMI indicates significant damage and worse prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrocardiography
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Bundle-branch block (BBB) complicates diagnosis and prognosis in acute myocardial infarction (MI).
- Differentiating between left BBB (LBBB) and right BBB (RBBB), and new-onset versus pre-existing BBB, is crucial.
- BBB can mask electrocardiographic signs of ST-elevation MI (STEMI).
Discussion:
- Analysis of the HERO-2 trial explored prognostic differences based on BBB type during early acute MI.
- The presence of RBBB in anterior STEMI is linked to increased mortality.
- RBBB in inferior infarction does not independently worsen prognosis.
Key Insights:
- Pre-existing LBBB is associated with poorer pre-infarction characteristics and worse prognosis.
- New-onset LBBB post-MI signifies ischemic conduction damage and carries independent negative prognostic value.
- Understanding BBB mechanisms and prognostic implications in acute MI is essential.
Outlook:
- Further research into the specific mechanisms linking BBB types to MI outcomes is warranted.
- Clinical guidelines should emphasize the prognostic significance of different BBB presentations in acute MI.
- Integration of BBB assessment into risk stratification protocols for MI patients is recommended.
Abstract:
In case of acute myocardial infarction and a bundle-branch block (BBB) major diagnostic and prognostic issues should be addressed with different considerations, depending on the presence of a left BBB (LBBB) or a right BBB (RBBB), distinguishing new or presumably new BBB, considering the possibility that the BBB masks electrocardiographic features of MI with ST-segment elevation. In this paper we briefly discuss the results of published trials that assessed the prognostic difference between different types of BBB during the early phase of acute myocardial infarction. The Wong et al. analysis of HERO-2 trial demonstrates that in the setting of an anterior STEMI, the presence of an RBBB, whatever its onset, is associated with a higher risk of death. The same analysis shows as RBBB associated with an inferior infarction does not portend a worse prognosis independently of its onset. Patients with LBBB already present at randomization were found to have worse pre-infarction characteristics, responsible, by itself, for the worst prognosis. However, the occurrence of an LBBB after randomization indicates a 'true' ischaemic conduction damage, thus carrying an independent negative prognostic value due to the large percentage of myocardium involved. HERO-2 trial, showing prognostic differences between different clinical presentations, underlines the importance to be familiar with the mechanisms related to BBBs and with the prognostic implications of BBBs in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction.
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antianginal Drugs: Nitrates and β-Blockers
Organic nitrates, such as nitroglycerin, play a pivotal role. Once metabolized, they liberate nitric oxide, a molecular marvel. Nitric oxide triggers guanylyl cyclase and augments cGMP production. This biochemical cascade orchestrates the relaxation of vascular smooth muscles, ushering in vasodilation and enhancing coronary blood flow. Administered...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers