Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023
Mechanistic applicability domains for nonanimal-based prediction of toxicological end points: general principles and
Aynur O Aptula1, David W Roberts
1SEAC, Unilever Colworth, Sharnbrook, Bedford, MK44 1LQ, England. nora.aptula@unilever.com
Abstract:
In light of new legislation (e.g., the REACH program in the European Union), several initiatives have recently emerged to increase acceptance of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships [(Q)SARs] to reduce reliance on animal (in vivo) testing. Among the principles for assessing the validity of (Q)SARs is the need for a defined domain of applicability, i.e., identification of the range of compounds for which the (Q)SAR can confidently be applied for purposes of toxicity prediction. Here, we attempt to develop a "natural" classification into applicability domains based on considering how a compound and the target organism between them "decide" on the nature and extent of the toxic effect. With particular emphasis on reactive toxicity, we present rules, based on organic reaction mechanistic principles, for classifying reactive toxicants into their appropriate mechanistic applicability domains.
Related Concept Videos
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Toxicokinetics: Overview
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Drug Toxicity: Overview
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models
