Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
Chi-square Analysis02:46

Chi-square Analysis

The chi-square test is a statistical hypothesis test. It is used to check whether there is a significant difference between an expected value and an observed value. In the context of genetics, it enables us to either accept or reject a hypothesis, based on how much the observed values deviate from the expected values.
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neighborhood-Level Racial and Ethnic Residential Segregation and Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

Racial and ethnic disparities in type 2 diabetes: does visceral fat play a role? Evidence from the MESA study.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2026
Same author

Assessment of Machine Learning Model Performance for Clinical Prediction of Insulin Resistance in the Study of Cardiovascular Risk in Adolescents-ERICA.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Association of Lipoprotein(a) and Interleukin-6 With Cardiovascular Risk: MESA and UK Biobank.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2025
Same author

Subclinical vascular burden in relation to cognitive decline and impairment: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Relationship between interleukin-6, coronary artery calcium and risk of heart failure: Insights from MESA.

American journal of preventive cardiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
04:50

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Quality of scientific articles.

Moyses Szklo1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. mszklo@jhsph.edu

Revista De Saude Publica
|August 23, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Authors should avoid common errors like long abstracts and misinterpreting data to improve manuscript quality for peer review. Addressing these issues enhances the reliability and validity of scientific publications.

Area of Science:

  • Scientific communication
  • Scholarly publishing
  • Research integrity

Background:

  • Peer review is the primary method for screening scientific manuscripts for publication.
  • The reliability and validity of the peer review process are imperfect.
  • Manuscript quality significantly impacts research dissemination and evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify common pitfalls in scientific manuscript preparation.
  • To provide guidance for authors submitting to peer-reviewed journals.
  • To discuss strategies for evaluating published research.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of common errors in manuscript preparation.
  • Review of limitations in current publication screening processes.
  • Discussion of best practices for reporting empirical findings.

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
04:50

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Main Results:

  • Key pitfalls include lengthy abstracts, excessive abbreviations, and inadequate reporting of data analyses.
  • Misinterpreting observational study associations as causal is a significant issue.
  • Manuscript length and impact factor are often poor indicators of quality.

Conclusions:

  • Avoiding common manuscript preparation errors can improve the quality of published research.
  • Authorship best practices are crucial for enhancing the peer review process.
  • Critical evaluation of published work, beyond traditional metrics, is necessary.