Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Testing effective connectivity changes with structural equation modeling: what does a bad model tell us?

Andrea B Protzner1, Anthony R McIntosh

  • 1Rotman Research Institute of Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Human Brain Mapping
|August 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Young and old adult brains experience opposite effects of acute sleep restriction on the functional connectivity network.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Towards precision EEG connectomics: Evaluating the benefits of dense sampling.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Correction: Brain signal complexity tracks mind-wandering and visual perceptual learning.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Ten simple rules for building a collaborative coding culture.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

The Brain Resilience Study protocol: Building a dataset of the biological and sociocultural factors affecting brain health in older adults.

Neurobiology of aging·2026
Same author

Exploring the Interplay Between BOLD Signal Variability, Complexity, Static and Dynamic Functional Brain Network Features During Movie Viewing.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking fMRI Denoising Pipelines.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Modeled Long-Term Effects of Psilocybin on Dynamic Activity and Effective Connectivity of Fronto-Striatal-Thalamic Circuits.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Intrinsic Functional Architecture Reflects Individual Differences in Passive Working Memory: An Exploratory Resting-State fMRI Study.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Symptom Overlap and Neurobiological Similarities Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Tinnitus.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Test-Retest Reliability of Sensorimotor Activity Measured With Spinal Cord fMRI.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

The Human Visual Claustrum Responses to Physical Stimulus Properties and Subjective Content During Movie Viewing.

Human brain mapping·2026
See all related articles

Structural equation modeling (SEM) reliably detects effective connectivity changes in neuroimaging, even with imperfect model fits. Using anatomical connectivity ensures valid inferences about task or group differences.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Network Analysis

Background:

  • Structural equation modeling (SEM) estimates effective connectivity in neuroimaging.
  • Concerns exist regarding the validity of SEM interpretations when models do not fit data well.
  • Anatomical connectivity has been used to constrain SEM for estimating effective connections.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if detecting effective connectivity differences in neuroimaging depends on absolute model fit.
  • To assess the robustness of SEM inferences under varying degrees of model misspecification.
  • To evaluate the impact of incorporating independent information, like anatomical connectivity, on SEM validity.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated two population networks with distinct effective connectivity patterns.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Extracted samples of varying sizes (N=100, 60, 20).
  • Assessed detection of effective connectivity differences across four scenarios of model misspecification.

    • Main Results:

    • Effective connectivity differences were detectable across all four scenarios, despite poor absolute model fit.
    • In scenarios with indirect routes, total effects captured overall task differences.
    • In scenarios where direct effects were removed but indirect routes remained, task differences were still expressed.

    Conclusions:

    • Inferences about task- or group-dependent changes in effective connectivity using SEM are valid, even with poor absolute model fit.
    • The use of independent information, such as anatomical connectivity, to define the causal structure in SEM enhances the robustness of findings.
    • SEM remains a valuable tool for analyzing effective connectivity in neuroimaging studies, provided appropriate constraints are applied.