Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why people underestimate y when extrapolating in linear functions.

Peter J Kwantes1, Andrew Neal

  • 1Defence Research and Development Canada-Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. peter.kwantes@drdc-rddc.gc.ca

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|August 30, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stereo-electroencephalography-guided cross-electrode radiofrequency thermocoagulation in focal epilepsy: A review of current methodologies and outcomes.

Epilepsia·2026
Same author

Timing for Starting Antiseizure Medication Withdrawal After Epilepsy Surgery in Adults.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Lesion Characteristics Using the Cross-Bonding Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Technique in an in vitro Model.

Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery·2025
Same author

Neuroimaging abnormalities in functional/dissociative seizures: a meta-analysis.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2025
Same author

Testing a Computational Model of Interruptions: The Effects of Time Pressure on Interruption and Response Decisions.

Human factors·2025
Same author

Using stereo-electroencephalography data to model the optimal intracranial venous sinus location for an endovascular seizure detection device: A feasibility study.

Epilepsia open·2025
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

When learning linear relationships, people tend to underestimate outcomes in the lower extrapolation region. This finding challenges existing function learning models, suggesting necessary modifications for accurate predictions.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Learning
  • Mathematical Cognition

Background:

  • Learners often struggle with extrapolation after acquiring knowledge of linear relationships.
  • Previous research indicated a general underestimation of criterion (y) values during extrapolation tasks.
  • Existing function learning models failed to fully explain these observed extrapolation patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the specific conditions under which underestimation occurs during extrapolation.
  • To test the predictive accuracy of current function learning models against empirical data.
  • To identify necessary modifications for existing models to better account for human extrapolation behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted three experiments involving learning a positive, linear relationship between a continuous predictor (x) and criterion (y).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed participants' predictions for new x values, focusing on extrapolation beyond the training data range.
  • Analyzed prediction patterns, specifically examining underestimation in different extrapolation regions.

    • Main Results:

    • The tendency to underestimate criterion (y) was found to be reliable only in the lower extrapolation region (x values between zero and the training range edge).
    • Existing models, including the extrapolation-association model and the population of linear experts model, did not accurately predict this specific pattern.
    • The study identified limitations in current models' ability to capture nuanced human extrapolation behavior.

    Conclusions:

    • Human extrapolation of linear functions is context-dependent, with underestimation primarily occurring in a specific range.
    • Both the extrapolation-association model and the population of linear experts model require adjustments to accurately predict observed human learning and extrapolation.
    • Minor modifications to existing function learning models can improve their capacity to explain empirical findings in extrapolation tasks.