Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Sample labeling: an overview.

Michael Brownstein1

  • 1The J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Methods in Enzymology
|August 30, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evaluating RNA and DNA labeling methods for microarray analysis is challenging due to limited comparative data and proprietary reagent details. This review highlights the difficulties in assessing and optimizing these critical molecular biology techniques.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Considerations beyond spine pain: do different co-occurring lower body joint pains differentially influence physical function and quality of life ratings?

BMC musculoskeletal disorders·2024
Same author

It's always both: Changing individuals requires changing systems and changing systems requires changing individuals.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same author

Change the People or Change the Policy? On the Moral Education of Antiracists.

Ethical theory and moral practice : an international forum·2023
Same author

Taking social psychology out of context.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2022
Same author

Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged 50 Years or Older: Obstacles to Bone Health Analysis and Follow-Up in a Community Setting.

Journal of hand surgery global online·2022
Same author

Injury Prevention, Safe Training Techniques, Rehabilitation, and Return to Sport in Trail Runners.

Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation·2022
Same journal

1,2-Aminothiol-specific conjugation for dual-color fluorescent labeling via ultrafast TAMM conjugates.

Methods in enzymology·2026
Same journal

Nitrone dipoles in bioorthogonal chemistry applications.

Methods in enzymology·2026
Same journal

Bioorthogonal labeling of sialic acid isomers for detection of glycoconjugates by mass spectrometry imaging and microscopy.

Methods in enzymology·2026
Same journal

Bioorthogonal photocatalytic proximity labeling for quantitative mapping of cell-cell interactions.

Methods in enzymology·2026
Same journal

inCu-click: Enabling copper-catalyzed click chemistry inside living cells.

Methods in enzymology·2026
Same journal

Site-specific antibody labeling via endo-S2 mediated Fc glycan remodeling.

Methods in enzymology·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Microarray studies rely on effective labeling of nucleic acid extracts (RNA and DNA).
  • Commercial reagent kits offer "optimized" but often poorly detailed solutions.
  • Comparative studies are scarce and may suffer from methodological inconsistencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically review available methods for RNA and DNA labeling in microarray experiments.
  • To identify challenges in comparing and validating these labeling techniques.
  • To assess the current landscape of nucleic acid labeling for genomic applications.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of published comparative studies on nucleic acid labeling techniques.
  • Analysis of challenges in experimental design and execution for validation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of factors influencing signal-to-noise ratio in microarray hybridization.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant lack of direct, high-quality comparative data for commercial labeling kits.
    • Difficulties in standardizing protocols, array processing, and data analysis across studies.
    • Emerging techniques show promise but require further validation and widespread adoption.

    Conclusions:

    • A critical evaluation of RNA and DNA labeling methods for microarrays is hampered by industry practices and research inconsistencies.
    • Standardization and transparent reporting are needed for reliable method comparison.
    • Further research is essential to validate novel labeling strategies and optimize existing ones for robust genomic analysis.