Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A computer method for assessing satisfaction with hearing aids.

K M Cienkowski1, M S McHugh, G J McHugo

  • 1Department of Communication Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. cienkowski@uconn.edu

International Journal of Audiology
|August 30, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding Organisms Using Ecological Observatory Networks.

Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)·2023
Same author

A Tarantula Bite.

Daniel's Texas medical journal·2023
Same author

Multivariate genetic architecture of the Anolis dewlap reveals both shared and sex-specific features of a sexually dimorphic ornament.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2017
Same author

Neuroaudiologic Correlates to Anatomical Changes of the Brain.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Managing Central Auditory Processing Disorders in Children and Youth.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

The Audiology Program at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same journal

Audiologists' views on patient empowerment in hearing rehabilitation: a focus group study.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Multi-stakeholder perspectives on models of in-person and remote cochlear implant aftercare and the opportunities and challenges for change.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Personal listening device usage, leisure noise exposure, hearing protection usage and hearing at standard frequencies: a longitudinal study from child/adolescence to young adulthood.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Cross-modal attentional allocation in individuals with listening difficulties: evidence from a complex dual-task paradigm.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Using NAL-NL3 in clinical practice: a modular NAL fitting system for real-world listening needs.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Does the Apple airpods pro 2 hearing aid feature meet prescribed targets for standardized audiograms?

International journal of audiology·2026
See all related articles

The Dynamic Assessment of Hearing Aids (DAHA) is a new tool for evaluating hearing aid satisfaction. It shows good reliability and validity, suggesting it

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Hearing Aid Technology
  • Clinical Assessment Tools

Background:

  • Traditional hearing aid satisfaction questionnaires can be cumbersome.
  • A need exists for more intuitive and objective patient-reported outcome measures.
  • Digital tools offer potential for enhanced data collection in audiology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the Dynamic Assessment of Hearing Aids (DAHA) in a large clinical population.
  • To assess the reliability and validity of the DAHA as a clinical tool.
  • To compare patient satisfaction ratings across different hearing aid domains.

Main Methods:

  • 191 participants completed the DAHA, a computer-based visual analogue rating system.
  • Test/retest reliability was assessed on a subset of participants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Concurrent validity was established by comparing DAHA scores with the Satisfaction With Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire.

    • Main Results:

    • The DAHA demonstrated good test/retest reliability and high internal consistency.
    • Strong correlation between DAHA and SADL total scores supported concurrent validity.
    • Patients reported highest satisfaction with personal reactions and lowest with communication, particularly in group settings and phone use.

    Conclusions:

    • The Dynamic Assessment of Hearing Aids (DAHA) appears to be a reliable and valid tool for clinical use.
    • The DAHA provides valuable insights into patient satisfaction with hearing aid features.
    • Findings highlight specific areas of hearing aid use (e.g., communication) where patient satisfaction may be lower.