Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Assessment of Respiratory Function in Conscious Mice by Double-chamber Plethysmography
Published on: July 10, 2018
Assessment of mid flow rate measurements in patients undergoing methacholine challenge
Michael R Simon1, Suzanne Havstad, Cristina Cotronei
1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Allergy and Immunology, Henry Ford Health System, One Ford Place, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. mrsimonmd@bcglobal.net
Abstract:
The objective of this study is to assess the FEF(25-75) and FEF(25-75)/FVC in relation to the FEV1 in patients who have had a methacholine inhalation challenge study for a variety of clinical indications. The study is a retrospective review of methacholine challenge results at the university medical center. One hundred twenty-one consecutive patients who had a methacholine challenge performed for clinical indications were included in the study with no intervention. Methacholine was administered in successively increasing twofold concentrations in doses from 0.62 mg to a final concentration of 10 mg. A 20% drop in FEV1 compared to the prechallenge value was considered a positive test. We considered > or = 25% decrease in FEF(25-75) as a significant change. The > or = 25% decrease in FEF(25-75) occurred sooner than the 20% drop in FEV1 with a positive response occurring at least one full dose sooner in 23 of the 55 subjects. Thirty two subjects reacted at the same dose. The dose at which the FEF(25-75) decreased by > or = 25% was significantly different from the corresponding dose causing a 20% decrease in FEV1. The FEF(25-75) decreases more per mg methacholine. There were no subjects in whom there was > or = 20% decrease in FEV1 without a > or = 25% decrease in FEF(25-75). The mean FEF(25-75)/FVC after diluent inhalation = 0.87 +/- 0.27 standard deviation with a range of 0.23 to 1.67. The doses at which the FEF(25-75)/FVC decreased by > or = 20% and by > or = 30% was significantly lower than the corresponding doses causing a 20% decrease in FEV1. FEF(25-75) and the FEF(25-75)/FVC are more sensitive but less specific than the FEV1 as indicators of a positive response to a methacholine challenge. The FEF(25-75)/FVC does not provide additional information to that provided by the FEF(25-75).
Related Concept Videos
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History

