Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing experimental designs for benchmark dose calculations for continuous endpoints.

Kristi Kuljus1, Dietrich von Rosen, Salomon Sand

  • 1Department of Biometry and Engineering, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7032, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. kristi.kuljus@bt.slu.se

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|September 5, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of the study carried out by ANSES on the effectiveness of sanitary shucking of queen scallops (<i>Aequipecten opercularis</i>) contaminated by okadaic acid toxins.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
Same author

Letter to the Editor: Critical analysis of "The use of canonical dose-response models for benchmark dose analysis of continuous toxicological data" by Slob et al. (2025).

Critical reviews in toxicology·2025
Same author

Derivation of a health-based guidance value for Δ<sup>8</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ<sup>8</sup>-THC) and its occurrence in food.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2025
Same author

Statement on the use and interpretation of the margin of exposure approach.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2025
Same author

Elevated levels of aquaporin-4-containing extracellular vesicles in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with bipolar disorder.

Upsala journal of medical sciences·2025
Same author

Risk assessment of complex organoarsenic species in food.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2024
Same journal

A Hybrid FMEA-AHP Framework for Risk Prioritization in Nontransparent Artificial Intelligence Systems.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Trust-Building Communication for Extreme Heat Preparedness.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Spring Broken: A Risk Analysis of Fatal and Nonfatal Traffic Injuries in Florida.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Global Sensitivity Analysis of Societal Resilience Using Shapley Values and Polynomial Chaos Expansion.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Assessing How Fact-Checks Influence Accuracy and Consensus Judgments: Evidence From the Olympics.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Applying the Bow Tie Method to Evaluate Emerging Risk: The Case of Carbon Capture and Water Stress.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
See all related articles

Optimizing experimental design for the benchmark dose (BMD) method is crucial for accurate chemical risk assessment. Using more dose groups, especially over four, and incorporating prior information improves BMD estimation and reduces uncertainty.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Biostatistics
  • Experimental Design

Background:

  • The benchmark dose (BMD) method, introduced by Crump (1984), is a key tool in chemical risk assessment, relying on dose-response modeling.
  • The lower confidence bound of the BMD estimate (BMDL) is used as a point of departure to account for data and model fitting uncertainties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate optimal experimental designs for applying the BMD method with continuous data, specifically using Hill models.
  • To determine if increasing the number of dose groups while decreasing animals per group enhances BMD estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Employed Bayesian designs, assuming a prior distribution for unknown parameters in nonlinear Hill models.
  • Utilized a design criterion focused on minimizing the expected variance of the BMD estimator.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculated design criterion values for various designs, analyzing the impact of dose group number, animals per group, and dose selection.

    • Main Results:

    • Calculations indicate that designs with more than four dose groups are beneficial for avoiding unfavorable dose placements.
    • The number of dose groups, animals per group, and specific dose choices significantly affect the BMD estimation variance.
    • Prior information about the dose-response curve can substantially improve experimental design.

    Conclusions:

    • Optimal experimental design for the BMD method, particularly with nonlinear models like Hill, requires careful consideration of the number of dose groups and dose levels.
    • Utilizing prior knowledge in Bayesian designs enhances the efficiency and reliability of BMD estimation in risk assessments.