Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Accuracy, limits, and approximation01:28

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intuitions about content moderation are misaligned with effective practices for reducing conspiracy beliefs.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Untangling the Web of Deceit: Examining Shared User Susceptibility Across Five Types of Digital Deceptions.

Human factors·2025
Same author

Promoting Teen Pregnancy Prevention: An Analysis of Social Media Content Strategy Over Five Years.

Health communication·2025
Same author

Using the Theory of Planned Behavior in Considering the Efficacy of Encountering Concussion Intervention Materials Online.

Health communication·2025
Same author

Generative propaganda: Evidence of AI's impact from a state-backed disinformation campaign.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

Combining interventions to reduce the spread of viral misinformation.

Nature human behaviour·2022
Same journal

Applying the Bow Tie Method to Evaluate Emerging Risk: The Case of Carbon Capture and Water Stress.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of Human H5N1 Infection From Consumption of Fluid Cow's Milk.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Global Renewable Energy Infrastructure Resilience Under Climate Risks.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Perceptions of Parcel-Level Wildfire Risk Differ Between Homeowners and Trained Assessors in Wildland-Urban Interface Communities Across the Western United States.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Modeling Systemic Risk Propagation in Public Assembly Fire Accidents: A Causal Network Approach Based on Apriori Analysis.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Identifying Urban Cascading Disaster Risks From the Past Disaster Processes: A Process Mining Approach.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
See all related articles
  1. Home
  2. Assessing How Fact-checks Influence Accuracy And Consensus Judgments: Evidence From The Olympics
  1. Home
  2. Assessing How Fact-checks Influence Accuracy And Consensus Judgments: Evidence From The Olympics

Related Experiment Video

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials
12:11

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Published on: April 27, 2021

Assessing How Fact-Checks Influence Accuracy and Consensus Judgments: Evidence From the Olympics

Morgan Wack1, Jinan Allan2, Brandon Boatwright3

  • 1Department of Communication and Media Research (IKMZ), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|June 26, 2026
Summary

No abstract available in PubMed .

Keywords:
consensus effectscontent moderationfact‐checkingmisinformationsports

Related Experiment Videos

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials
12:11

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Published on: April 27, 2021