Cost-effectiveness of 4 neonatal screening strategies for cystic fibrosis

M Elske van den Akker-van Marle1, Hinke M Dankert, Paul H Verkerk

  • 1Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Quality of Life, Leiden, Netherlands. elske.vandenakker@tno.nl

Pediatrics
|September 5, 2006
PubMed

Insights

Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis is cost-effective, with the immunoreactive trypsin + immunoreactive trypsin strategy offering the best value. This approach improves health outcomes and can lead to financial savings.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Economics
  • Public Health
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Cystic fibrosis (CF) screening in newborns is crucial for early intervention.
  • Evaluating the economic impact and health benefits of different screening strategies is essential for healthcare policy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the costs and health effects of four distinct neonatal screening strategies for cystic fibrosis.
  • To determine the most cost-effective approach for newborn screening of CF.

Main Methods:

  • An economic-modeling exercise was conducted in the Netherlands using published data and expert opinions.
  • A hypothetical cohort of 200,000 neonates was analyzed to assess costs and life-years gained.
  • The study evaluated screening strategies involving immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) tests and various DNA mutation analyses.

Main Results:

  • The IRT + IRT strategy demonstrated the most favorable cost-effectiveness ratio at 24,800 euro per life-year gained.
  • The IRT + DNA + denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) strategy yielded greater health effects at a lower cost compared to IRT + DNA + IRT.
  • Considering changes in reproductive decisions, neonatal CF screening may result in annual financial savings of approximately 1.8 million euro.

Conclusions:

  • Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis presents a sound economic option with expected positive health outcomes.
  • The IRT + IRT and IRT + DNA + DGGE strategies are identified as the most cost-effective screening approaches.
Abstract