Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
Cost-effectiveness of 4 neonatal screening strategies for cystic fibrosis
M Elske van den Akker-van Marle1, Hinke M Dankert, Paul H Verkerk
1Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Quality of Life, Leiden, Netherlands. elske.vandenakker@tno.nl
Insights
Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis is cost-effective, with the immunoreactive trypsin + immunoreactive trypsin strategy offering the best value. This approach improves health outcomes and can lead to financial savings.
Area of Science:
- Medical Economics
- Public Health
- Genetics
Background:
- Cystic fibrosis (CF) screening in newborns is crucial for early intervention.
- Evaluating the economic impact and health benefits of different screening strategies is essential for healthcare policy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the costs and health effects of four distinct neonatal screening strategies for cystic fibrosis.
- To determine the most cost-effective approach for newborn screening of CF.
Main Methods:
- An economic-modeling exercise was conducted in the Netherlands using published data and expert opinions.
- A hypothetical cohort of 200,000 neonates was analyzed to assess costs and life-years gained.
- The study evaluated screening strategies involving immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) tests and various DNA mutation analyses.
Main Results:
- The IRT + IRT strategy demonstrated the most favorable cost-effectiveness ratio at 24,800 euro per life-year gained.
- The IRT + DNA + denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) strategy yielded greater health effects at a lower cost compared to IRT + DNA + IRT.
- Considering changes in reproductive decisions, neonatal CF screening may result in annual financial savings of approximately 1.8 million euro.
Conclusions:
- Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis presents a sound economic option with expected positive health outcomes.
- The IRT + IRT and IRT + DNA + DGGE strategies are identified as the most cost-effective screening approaches.
Objectives:
The purpose of this work was to assess the costs of 4 neonatal screening strategies for cystic fibrosis in relation to health effects. In each strategy, the first test was the measurement of serum concentration of immunoreactive trypsin. The second step consisted of either a second immunoreactive trypsin test (strategy 1) or a multiple mutation analysis (strategy 2). In strategies 3 and 4, a third step was added to strategy 2: a second immunoreactive trypsin test (strategy 3) or an extended mutation analysis of the cystic fibrosis gene, that is, a denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis (strategy 4).
Methods:
We conducted an economic-modeling exercise in the Netherlands based on published data and expert opinions. Subjects were a hypothetical cohort of 200 000 neonates, the approximate number of children born annually in the Netherlands, and we assessed the costs and number of life-years gained as a result of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis. The costs and effects of changes in reproductive decisions because of neonatal screening were also assessed.
Results:
Immunoreactive trypsin + immunoreactive trypsin had the most favorable cost-effectiveness ratio of 24,800 euro per life-year gained. Immunoreactive trypsin + DNA + denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis achieved more health effects than immunoreactive trypsin + DNA + immunoreactive trypsin at lower cost. The incremental costs per life-year gained of the immunoreactive trypsin + DNA + denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis strategy compared with the immunoreactive trypsin + immunoreactive trypsin strategy were 130,700 euro, whereas the incremental costs of the immunoreactive trypsin + DNA strategy compared with the immunoreactive trypsin + DNA + denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis strategy were 2,154,300 euro. When changes in reproductive decisions as a result of neonatal screening are also taken into account, neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis may lead to financial savings of approximately 1.8 million euro annually, depending on the screening strategy used.
Conclusions:
Cystic fibrosis screening for neonates is a good economic option, and positive health effects can also be expected. Immunoreactive trypsin + immunoreactive trypsin and immunoreactive trypsin + DNA + denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis are the most cost-effective strategies.
More Related Videos
06:14Optimized LC-MS/MS Method for the High-throughput Analysis of Clinical Samples of Ivacaftor, Its Major Metabolites, and Lumacaftor in Biological Fluids of Cystic Fibrosis Patients
Published on: October 15, 2017
08:55Nasal Potential Difference to Quantify Trans-epithelial Ion Transport in Mice
Published on: July 4, 2018