Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Visualization and Quantification of Intermolecular RNA Base Pairing in in vitro RNA Clusters Using Split Broccoli RNA Reporters
Published on: May 29, 2026
Pairwise coupling analysis of helical junction hydrogen bonding interactions in luteoviral RNA pseudoknots
Peter V Cornish1, David P Giedroc
1Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2128 TAMU, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2128, USA.
Abstract:
A 28-nucleotide mRNA pseudoknot that overlaps the P1 and P2 genes of sugarcane yellow leaf virus (ScYLV) stimulates -1 ribosomal frameshifting. The in vitro frameshifting efficiency is decreased >or=8-fold upon substitution of the 3'-most loop 2 nucleotide (C27) with adenosine, which accepts a hydrogen bond from the 2'-OH group of C14 in stem S1. The solution structures of the wild-type (WT) and C27A ScYLV RNA pseudoknots show that while the RNAs adopt virtually identical overall structures, there are significant structural differences at the helical junctions of the two RNAs. Specifically, C8(+) in loop L1 in the C8(+).(G12.C28) L1-S2 major groove base triple is displaced by approximately 2.3 A relative to the accepting stem 2 base pair (G12.C28) in the C27A RNA. Here, we use a double mutant cycle approach to analyze the pairwise coupling of the C8(+).(G12.C28)...C27.(C14-G7) and ...A27.(C14-G7) hydrogen bonds in the WT and C27A ScYLV RNAs, respectively, and compare these findings with previous results from the beet western yellows virus (BWYV) RNA. We find that the pairwise coupling free energy (delta(AB)(i)) is favorable for the WT RNA (-0.7 +/- 0.1 kcal/mol), thus revealing that formation of these two hydrogen bonds is positively cooperative. In contrast, delta(AB)(i) is 0.9 +/- 0.4 kcal/mol for the poorly functional C27A ScYLV RNA, indicative of nonadditive hydrogen bond formation. These results reveal that cooperative hydrogen bond formation across the helical stem junction in H-type pseudoknots correlates with enhanced frameshift stimulation by luteoviral mRNA pseudoknots.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Hydrogen Bonds
Hydrogen Bonds

