Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

04:38
Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy
Published on: April 19, 2024
[Cost analysis of reprocessing disposable forceps used in video-assisted surgery]
Eliane Molina Psaltikidis1, Kazuko Uchikawa Graziano, Fábio Frezatti
1Hospital Novo Atibaia. eliane.enf@hospitalnovo.com.br
Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem
|September 13, 2006
Summary
Reprocessing disposable forceps for minimally invasive surgery is costly, especially when quality control is implemented. These findings highlight the financial implications of instrument reuse in healthcare settings.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Technology
- Healthcare Economics
- Medical Device Reprocessing
Background:
- Disposable surgical instruments, such as forceps used in video-assisted surgery, are frequently reused due to their high initial cost.
- Limited research exists on the actual reprocessing costs associated with these disposable items.
- Understanding these costs is crucial for healthcare economic evaluations and resource management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the reprocessing costs of disposable forceps utilized in video-assisted surgery.
- To evaluate the financial impact of implementing quality control measures during instrument reprocessing.
Main Methods:
- A multiple case study methodology was employed.
- Data collection involved direct observation and document analysis across three hospitals in São Paulo.
- Cost analysis focused on reprocessing expenses per instrument.
Main Results:
- Without stringent quality control, reprocessing costs were low: R$9.37, R$6.59, and R$3.31 across the three cases.
- Implementing quality control measures significantly increased reprocessing costs: R$185.19, R$595.82, and R$363.10, respectively.
- Cost variations indicate the substantial influence of quality control protocols on overall reprocessing expenses.
Conclusions:
- The reprocessing cost of disposable forceps in video-assisted surgery is highly variable and significantly influenced by quality control adherence.
- While seemingly cost-effective initially, the true cost of reprocessing these instruments, particularly with robust quality assurance, requires careful consideration.
- Further investigation into standardized reprocessing protocols and their economic impact is warranted.

