Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

11:06
Identifying DNA Mutations in Purified Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells
Published on: February 24, 2014
Assessing the predictive accuracy of hMLH1 and hMSH2 mutation probability models
Kory W Jasperson1, Katrina Lowstuter, Jeffrey N Weitzel
1Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010-3000, USA. kjasperson@coh.org
Journal of Genetic Counseling
|September 14, 2006
Summary
Current guidelines for identifying Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) lack accuracy. The Wijnen model and Myriad table are insufficient for guiding genetic testing decisions in HNPCC families.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Oncology
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) increases susceptibility to colorectal and extra-colonic cancers.
- Existing guidelines for HNPCC family identification lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity.
- The Wijnen pre-test probability model and Myriad Genetics Laboratory prevalence table were developed to improve HNPCC detection accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the Wijnen model and Myriad table for HNPCC genetic mutations.
- To compare the performance of these models against existing guidelines in identifying individuals with HNPCC.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 49 patients who underwent genetic testing for hMLH1/hMSH2 germline mutations.
- Evaluation of the revised Bethesda guidelines, Wijnen model, and Myriad table performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity).
- Assessment of predictive accuracy using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.
Main Results:
- Revised Bethesda guidelines showed high sensitivity (94.4%) but low specificity (12.9%) for germline mutations.
- At a 10.0% mutation probability threshold, Wijnen model and Myriad table had sensitivities of 55.6% and 60.0%, respectively.
- Specificities for the Wijnen model and Myriad table were 54.8% and 23.8%, respectively; both were poor predictors of mutation prevalence (ROC AUCs 0.616 and 0.400).
Conclusions:
- Neither the Wijnen model nor the Myriad table demonstrate adequate sensitivity or specificity for HNPCC genetic testing decisions.
- Current predictive models and guidelines require improvement for accurate HNPCC diagnosis.
- Further research is needed to develop more reliable tools for identifying individuals eligible for HNPCC genetic testing.