Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Underestimation of pacing threshold as determined by an automatic ventricular threshold testing algorithm.

William H Sauer1, Joshua M Cooper, Rebecca W Lai

  • 1Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA. william.sauer@uphs.upenn.edu

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
|September 20, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Limited association between septal myocardial involvement on PET imaging and conduction disturbance in cardiac sarcoidosis.

Heart rhythm O2·2026
Same author

Distinct Purkinje electrogram phenotypes at ventricular fibrillation trigger sites in idiopathic and structural heart disease.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same author

Pacemaker implant and programming challenges in a young patient with painful left bundle branch block syndrome.

HeartRhythm case reports·2026
Same author

Trigger- vs Substrate-Based Purkinje De-Networking for Ventricular Fibrillation: Insights From a Multicenter Study.

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology·2026
Same author

Adjunctive Purkinje Denetworking During Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Prior Ventricular Fibrillation.

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology·2026
Same author

Impact of age and diagnosis-to-ablation time on sex differences in 12-month outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: An admIRE subanalysis.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same journal

Dual Coronary Sinus Lead Strategy to Avoid Tricuspid Valve Traversal in Biventricular Pacing.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

A Case of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation via the Epicardial Approach Using the 3830 Lead in an 11-Day-Old Neonate (With Follow-Up of the Above Case).

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Tilt Test Duration in Suspected Vasovagal Syncope: Temporal Patterns and Diagnostic Yield in Patients From Central China.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Combined Leadless Pacing and Subcutaneous ICD Therapy in Long QT Syndromes.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Association of Anesthesia Modality With Procedural Parameters and Clinical Outcomes in PVI for Atrial Fibrillation.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
See all related articles

Manual and automatic pacing threshold tests yielded different results due to varying AV intervals. Altered diastolic filling periods in the right ventricle impacted pacing thresholds with a new lead.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Pacing threshold determination is crucial for optimal pacemaker function.
  • Automatic algorithms like Ventricular Capture Management (VCM) aim to simplify threshold testing.
  • Manual threshold testing is a traditional method requiring careful parameter adjustment.

Observation:

  • A significant discrepancy was observed between manual threshold testing and VCM algorithm results.
  • The difference in pacing thresholds was linked to the specific AV intervals employed during each test.
  • The patient had a new passive fixation lead implanted in the right ventricular apex.

Findings:

  • The study identified that varying AV intervals between manual and automatic testing methods caused differing pacing threshold values.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Altered right ventricular dimensions, influenced by changes in diastolic filling periods, were proposed as a contributing factor to the threshold variability.
  • This suggests that lead characteristics and patient-specific cardiac dynamics can influence automatic threshold measurements.

    • Implications:

    • Clinicians should be aware of potential discrepancies in pacing thresholds derived from different testing modalities.
    • Further research is needed to understand how AV interval settings and patient hemodynamics affect automatic capture management algorithms.
    • Optimizing threshold testing protocols may improve the safety and efficacy of cardiac pacing therapy.