Judgments of associative memory
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
1Department of Psychology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-2051, USA. Bill.Maki@ttu.edu
Abstract:
Judgments of associative memory (JAM) were indexed by ratings given to pairs of cue and response words. The normed probabilities, p(response|cue), were obtained from free association norms. The ratings were linearly related to the probabilities. The JAM functions were characterized by high intercepts ( approximately 50 on a 100 point scale) and shallow slopes (<0.5). The JAM function generalized across materials and method of rating. The function was not affected by expectancies or semantic similarity. Attempts to alter the function by making alternative responses more available were unsuccessful. A computer simulation model (MINERVA 2) exhibited the linear JAM function and successfully accounted for more complex phenomena (like the joint influence of forward and backward associative strengths on ratings). The shallow JAM slope appears to result from a fundamental lack of discrimination among associative strengths. The high intercept appears to result partly from an independent post-mnemonic source of bias producing over-estimation of association.
Related Concept Videos
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
The Influence of Affect on Cognition
Role of Amygdala in Memory
One of the...
