Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling01:26

Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling

During leveling, the Earth's curvature and atmospheric refraction introduce deviations in the line of sight from a true horizontal reference. When the line of sight is leveled, it remains perpendicular to the plumb line only at a single point. Beyond this, it deviates due to the Earth’s curvature, represented by the correction C. For a sight distance D, the deviation can be derived using the relationship:This relationship shows that the deviation increases quadratically with distance. Over a...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pupil aberration coefficients in plane-symmetric optical systems.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same author

Single-step alignment of a two-mirror telescope using sigma vectors in nodal aberration theory.

Applied optics·2026
Same author

Two-level optimizer for large-scale metasurfaces with strong near-field coupling.

Optics express·2026
Same author

Wide-range High-precision Eye-tracking based on Purkinje Reflections.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2026
Same author

Analytical aberration theory for plane-symmetric optical systems and its application in distortion analysis of spectrometers: erratum.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2025
Same author

Source wavefront generation for a non-interferometric reconfigurable null test using a photonic lantern.

Optics letters·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Measurements of Waves in a Wind-wave Tank Under Steady and Time-varying Wind Forcing
08:54

Measurements of Waves in a Wind-wave Tank Under Steady and Time-varying Wind Forcing

Published on: February 13, 2018

Quantifications of error propagation in slope-based wavefront estimations.

Weiyao Zou1, Jannick P Rolland

  • 1CREOL, The College of Optics and Photonics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32816, USA.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision
|September 21, 2006
PubMed
Summary

For wavefront estimation, odd-numbered grid sizes improve error propagation. The Southwell geometry consistently offers the best error control for both slope-based and difference-based methods, especially with odd grid sizes.

More Related Videos

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Characterization of Surface Modifications by White Light Interferometry: Applications in Ion Sputtering, Laser Ablation, and Tribology Experiments
11:47

Characterization of Surface Modifications by White Light Interferometry: Applications in Ion Sputtering, Laser Ablation, and Tribology Experiments

Published on: February 27, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Measurements of Waves in a Wind-wave Tank Under Steady and Time-varying Wind Forcing
08:54

Measurements of Waves in a Wind-wave Tank Under Steady and Time-varying Wind Forcing

Published on: February 13, 2018

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Characterization of Surface Modifications by White Light Interferometry: Applications in Ion Sputtering, Laser Ablation, and Tribology Experiments
11:47

Characterization of Surface Modifications by White Light Interferometry: Applications in Ion Sputtering, Laser Ablation, and Tribology Experiments

Published on: February 27, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Optical testing
  • Wavefront sensing and control
  • Metrology

Background:

  • Error propagation is critical in wavefront estimation.
  • Existing methods like slope-based and difference-based estimations have varying error characteristics.
  • Standard geometries like Fried and Southwell are used, each with unique properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze and compare error propagation coefficients for different wavefront estimation geometries.
  • To establish functions relating error propagation to matrix eigenvalues for various geometries.
  • To identify optimal geometries and grid sizes for minimizing wavefront estimation errors.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical analysis of error propagation coefficients.
  • Derivation of functions based on eigenvalues of wavefront-estimation matrices.
  • Comparison of error propagators across different geometries (Fried, Southwell) and grid sizes (odd/even).
  • Investigation of minimum-norm least-squares solutions.

Main Results:

  • Odd-numbered grid sizes generally yield better error propagators than even-numbered sizes.
  • The Southwell geometry demonstrates superior error propagation performance for both slope-based and difference-based methods.
  • Noll's theoretical result aligns with Southwell geometry using odd grid sizes.
  • Fried geometry is typically less preferred due to potential subsize estimations and rank deficiency.

Conclusions:

  • The Southwell geometry, particularly with odd-numbered grid sizes and a defined zero point, is recommended for optical testing.
  • This geometry minimizes error propagation in both slope-based and difference-based wavefront estimations.
  • Understanding eigenvalue relationships is key to optimizing wavefront estimation accuracy.