Related Experiment Videos
Reporting adverse events in randomized controlled trials
1Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. james.nuovo@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
Purpose:
How randomized controlled trial results are reported may minimize concerns and detection of adverse side effects. We aimed to describe the methods of reporting adverse events in these published trials.
Methods:
Five frequently cited journals were investigated: Annals of Internal Medicine, British Medical Journal, JAMA, The Lancet, and the New England Journal of Medicine. For each journal, all randomized controlled trials conducted on the use of a medication were selected from January 2000 through June 2003. All issues of each journal were reviewed manually. Information retrieved included any mention of adverse events in the abstract, methods, results, or discussion section of the article; or inclusion of adverse events data in tables or figures. We also cataloged whether there was a separate subheading in the results section for reporting adverse events. Reports of trials that referred to methods described in a previous report were excluded.
Results:
There were 521 eligible articles. Explicit mention of adverse events was in 328 (63%) of abstracts (range 47-66%), 380 (73%) of methods (range 51-81%), 464 (89%) of results (range 80-95%), and 250 (48%) of tables (range 31-49%). There was a separate subheading for adverse events in 240 (46%) (range 22-64%) of the eligible articles.
Conclusion:
There is variation among authors and journals as to the location of reporting adverse events and the means by which it is done. Authors and editors should include specific information on adverse events when reporting the results of randomized controlled trials. It would be ideal if there was more consistency among authors and journals as to how these adverse events are described.
Insights
Reporting of adverse events in randomized controlled trials varies significantly. Authors and editors should improve consistency in detailing side effects to ensure patient safety and trial transparency.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Medical Research
- Pharmacovigilance
Background:
- Reporting of adverse events in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is crucial for assessing drug safety.
- Inconsistent reporting practices may obscure potential risks and patient safety concerns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and describe the methods used for reporting adverse events in published RCTs.
- To identify variations in how adverse events are presented across major medical journals.
Main Methods:
- A manual review of 521 eligible RCTs published between January 2000 and June 2003 in five high-impact medical journals.
- Data extraction focused on the mention and location of adverse event information (abstract, methods, results, discussion, tables, figures) and dedicated subheadings.
Main Results:
- Adverse events were mentioned in abstracts (63%), methods (73%), results (89%), and tables (48%).
- A separate subheading for adverse events in the results section was present in only 46% of articles.
- Significant variation was observed in reporting practices across journals and within different sections of the articles.
Conclusions:
- There is considerable heterogeneity in the reporting of adverse events in RCTs.
- Authors and journal editors should strive for greater consistency and clarity in presenting adverse event data.
- Standardized reporting of adverse events is essential for comprehensive safety evaluation and informed clinical decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Blinding
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...