Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An extended likelihood ratio framework for interpreting evidence.

J S Buckleton1, C M Triggs, C Champod

  • 1University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.

Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society
|September 28, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Machine learning algorithms in forensic science: A response to Morrison et al. (2022).

Forensic science international. Synergy·2022
Same author

Probabilistic reporting and algorithms in forensic science: Stakeholder perspectives within the American criminal justice system.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2022
Same author

Implementation of algorithms in pattern & impression evidence: A responsible and practical roadmap.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2021
Same author

A method for measuring the quality of friction skin impression evidence: Method development and validation.

Forensic science international·2021
Same author

Reply to Morrison et al. (2016) Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2017
Same author

Finding the way forward for forensic science in the US-A commentary on the PCAST report.

Forensic science international·2017
Same journal

When termites mimic disease: Vertebral osteolysis and indoor scene alteration in the French West Indies.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Forensic soil comparison for traffic accidents caused by soil clods on roadway.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Chemical profiling of counterfeit perfumes: insights within a forensic intelligence approach.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

The forensic limits of hair drug testing: a critical assessment of drug intake and hair concentration relationships.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Carrying the aftermath: forensic trauma as a predictable occupational injury in a lifecycle systems framework.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Footprint analysis in a subadult Slovak population (aged 10-18 years) for stature estimation: a preliminary study.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
See all related articles

This study reviews current forensic evidence interpretation methods, highlighting their shortcomings. It proposes an extended likelihood ratio approach using Bayesian networks for more robust evidence presentation.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Probability Theory
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Current methods for interpreting forensic evidence, including likelihood ratio-based and full Bayesian approaches, have identified shortcomings.
  • These limitations impact the objective presentation of scientific evidence in legal contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing methods for forensic evidence interpretation.
  • To propose a novel approach that addresses the limitations of current methods.
  • To enhance the presentation of forensic evidence by combining logical merits with statistical rigor.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on likelihood ratio-based and full Bayesian approaches.
  • Development of an extended likelihood ratio framework.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of Bayesian networks for inferential modeling.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified and discussed shortcomings in current evidence interpretation methods.
    • Formally presented a new approach based on an extended likelihood ratio.
    • Demonstrated the utility of Bayesian networks within the proposed framework.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed extended likelihood ratio approach offers a balanced method for evidence interpretation.
    • This approach integrates the strengths of existing methods while mitigating their weaknesses.
    • Utilizing Bayesian networks enhances the logical and statistical foundation for presenting forensic evidence.