Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
Published on: May 26, 2020
Beyond the p -value: Pitfalls in Reporting and Applying Statistical Tests in Sports Science
Roberto C M Leite1, Rhaí A Arriel1, Rodney Paixão1
1Integrated Laboratory of Physiology and Performance (LABIFID)Department of Biophysics and PhysiologyFederal University of Juiz de ForaJuiz de ForaMinas GeraisBrazil.
Most sports science research (87.4%) has statistical reporting or analysis flaws, impacting validity and interpretation. Improving statistical literacy and peer review is crucial for rigorous sports science.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Statistics
- Research Methodology
Background:
- Statistical inference is vital for sports science research credibility.
- Concerns exist regarding the rigor of statistical reporting and analysis in the field.
- Established methodological guidelines exist for statistical practices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the adequacy of statistical practices in sports science research.
- To identify common reporting omissions and statistical misapplications.
- To evaluate the relationship between statistical adequacy and journal ranking.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of 167 original studies from 2020.
- Studies were selected from 15 sports science journals (Q1-Q3 JCR indexed).
- Data on study characteristics and statistical methods were extracted and analyzed.
Main Results:
- 87.4% of studies exhibited at least one statistical inadequacy.
- Frequent omissions included failure to report statistical assumptions (normality, homogeneity of variances, sphericity).
- Common misapplications involved inappropriate dependent variables and treating independent observations as dependent.
Conclusions:
- Significant statistical deficiencies exist across sports science research, regardless of journal quartile.
- These issues threaten research validity, reproducibility, and practical interpretation.
- Enhanced statistical literacy, stricter reporting standards, and improved peer review are necessary.
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
