Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Paradoxical inhibition of autonomic output following cortical suppression: When inhibiting an inhibitor results in more (not less) inhibition.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same author

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same author

Spatial Learning in Naturalistic Search With Simulated Vision Loss.

Translational vision science & technology·2026
Same author

Serial dependence is stronger for peripheral than for central vision.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Eccentricity determines the competition for attention.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Selective attention and eccentricity: A comprehensive review.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Input control processes in rapid serial visual presentations: target selection and distractor inhibition.

Christian N L Olivers1, Derrick G Watson

  • 1Department of Cognitive Psychology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. cnl.olivers@psy.vu.nl

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|September 28, 2006
PubMed
Summary

The attentional blink, where the second target is missed, is affected by target selection processes. Shared colors between targets and distractors influence this attentional blink effect.

More Related Videos

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Attention

Background:

  • The attentional blink (AB) is a phenomenon where the second of two targets in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) is often missed.
  • Existing theories primarily focus on post-selection limited-capacity processes.
  • This study investigates the role of target selection mechanisms in the AB.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore how target selection processes contribute to the attentional blink.
  • To examine the influence of stimulus properties, such as color, on attentional blink magnitude.
  • To understand the interplay between excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms in visual target selection.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task with two targets.
  • The study manipulated color similarity between targets, distractors, and subsequent visual stimuli (dot patterns).
  • Performance on a dot pattern enumeration task was measured to assess the attentional blink.

Main Results:

  • Identifying a target letter induced an attentional blink for subsequent dot pattern enumeration.
  • This blink was attenuated when dot colors matched the target letter color.
  • Conversely, performance degraded when dot colors matched distractor colors.
  • Target similarity also influenced competition in simultaneous dot displays.

Conclusions:

  • Target selection in RSVP tasks is not solely a pre-attentive process.
  • Both excitatory and inhibitory attentional control mechanisms are crucial for selecting targets from RSVP streams.
  • Stimulus features like color play a significant role in modulating the attentional blink via selection mechanisms.