Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.

Christian N L Olivers1, Frank Meijer, Jan Theeuwes

  • 1Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. cnl.olivers@psy.vu.nl

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|September 28, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learned statistical regularity modulates anticipatory micro-saccades toward suppressed distractor locations.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same author

35+ years of the additional singleton task: Design features and guidelines.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Spatial Learning in Naturalistic Search With Simulated Vision Loss.

Translational vision science & technology·2026
Same author

Dynamic competition between bottom-up saliency and top-down goals in early visual cortex.

Communications biology·2026
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Visual attention and visual working memory share content representations, influencing how we process information. Memory-related distractors capture attention based on specific content, demonstrating memory-driven attentional capture.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Visual attention selects relevant information, while visual working memory retains it.
  • The shared representations between attention and memory are not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if visual attention and visual working memory utilize the same content representations.
  • To determine how memory content influences attentional capture.

Main Methods:

  • Seven experiments were conducted using visual search and memory tasks.
  • Singleton distractors were introduced to assess interference.
  • Eye movements and task performance were recorded.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Distractors identical or related to memory content caused greater interference, especially when memory content was hard to verbalize.
  • Content-specific interactions were observed for relevant memory features.
  • Memory-related distractors increased eye movements but not fixation duration.

    • Conclusions:

    • Visual attention and visual working memory share content-specific representations.
    • Memory content can drive attentional capture, influencing visual processing.