Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Computed Tomography

Computed Tomography

Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

DefinitionComputed Tomography (CT) of the genitourinary (GU) tract is a non-invasive imaging modality that utilizes X-rays and computer processing to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the urinary system, encompassing the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and adjacent structures such as the adrenal glands.PurposeCT scans of the GU tract serve several diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including:Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Diseases: Detects kidney stones, tumors, cysts, and congenital...

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) scanning is an advanced cardiac imaging technique that utilizes CT technology, with or without intravenous (IV) contrast, to produce accurate cross-sectional virtual slices of specific areas of the heart, coronary circulation, and major blood vessels such as the aorta, pulmonary veins, and arteries. The computer processes these slices to generate three-dimensional images. Multidetector CT (MDCT) is a rapid form of CT scanning that captures multiple slices...

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

Radiological investigations, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans, are critical for diagnosing and evaluating various medical conditions. These imaging techniques provide valuable insights into the body's internal structures, aiding in the detection of abnormalities, assessment of disease progression, and development of treatment strategies. This article delves into two primary radiological investigations, chest X-rays and CT scans, outlining their purpose, procedures, and the...

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

Calcium-Scoring CT ScanA calcium-scoring CT scan, also known as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, detects calcium deposits in the coronary arteries. This test assesses the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), which can lead to cardiovascular events such as angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac arrest.A calcium-scoring CT scan is generally recommended for individuals at intermediate risk of CAD without symptoms. It includes:Men aged 40-75 and women aged 50-75: Especially those with a...

Positron Emission Tomography

Positron Emission Tomography

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a medical imaging technique involving radiopharmaceuticals — substances that emit short-lived radiation. Although the first PET scanner was introduced in 1961, it took 15 more years before radiopharmaceuticals were combined with the technique and revolutionized its potential.
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body being...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Treosulfan-fludarabine conditioning in infants with severe combined immunodeficiencies: Extended study of the UK paediatric treosulfan study.

British journal of haematology·2026

Same author

Thromboelastography to monitor anticoagulation in ICU patients receiving a continuous infusion of unfractionated heparin.

Journal of critical care·2026

Same author

Texture analysis of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT may stratify risk in stage II colorectal cancer - discovery findings.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2025

Same author

Professionals' Views on Social Care Planning and Provision for People With Young-Onset Dementia and Their Families in England: Findings From the DYNAMIC Study.

International journal of geriatric psychiatry·2025

Same author

Psoriatic Arthritis Priority Setting Partnership: patient- and clinician-informed considerations for future UK health service delivery.

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)·2024

Same author

Furosemide with adjunctive acetazolamide vs furosemide only in critically ill patients: A pilot two-center randomized controlled trial.

Journal of critical care·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

Quantitative contrast-enhanced computed tomography: is there a need for system calibration?

Kenneth A Miles¹, Helen Young, Sandra L Chica

¹Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9PX, UK. k.a.miles@bsms.ac.uk

European Radiology

|September 30, 2006

Summary

Computed tomography (CT) system variability impacts contrast enhancement measurements. Individual CT system calibration for iodine response is essential for consistent, comparable quantitative analysis across institutions, improving diagnostic accuracy.

More Related Videos

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

Area of Science:

Medical Imaging
Radiology
Quantitative CT

Background:

Quantitative measurements of contrast enhancement in CT imaging are crucial for diagnosis.
Variability in CT system performance can affect the accuracy of these measurements.
Standardization across different CT systems is needed for reliable quantitative analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the influence of computed tomography (CT) system variability on quantitative contrast enhancement measurements.
To assess the consistency of CT system calibration and its impact on iodine concentration quantification.
To determine the necessity of individual CT system calibration for accurate contrast enhancement analysis.

Main Methods:

Phantom studies were conducted using contrast material at various dilutions.
Eleven CT systems from nine institutions were utilized for imaging.
Routine system calibrations were performed according to manufacturer guidelines.

Main Results:

A single CT system showed a 17-24% variation in iodine concentration versus CT attenuation over 46-48 weeks.
Coefficients of variance for iodine calibration factors ranged from 5.1% (in water) to 8.9% (in air) across systems.
Significant variability in quantitative measurements was observed due to CT system differences.

Conclusions:

Individual CT system calibration for iodine response is necessary for inter-institutional comparison of contrast enhancement.
Expressing contrast enhancement as iodine concentration using a calibration factor can standardize measurements.
Software-based calculations could facilitate universal application of diagnostic enhancement thresholds.