Texture analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT may stratify risk in stage II colorectal cancer - discovery findings
Louise Rice1, Balaji Ganeshan2, Simon Wan2,3,1
1Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospital (UCLH), London, UK.
Rationale:
It is challenging to identify which patients with Stage II colorectal cancer (T3N0M0 and T4N0M0) are at high risk of recurrence and might benefit from additional therapies. This preliminary study examines whether multiparametric [18F]FDG PET/CT is superior to T-stage in predicting overall survival in this patient group.
Materials And Methods:
This multicentre, prospective observational study included 66 patients (41 male, 25 female, mean age 69.1 ± 10.3yrs) with biopsy-proven Stage II colorectal cancer who underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT prior to resection. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed on PET and image texture parameters and clinico-histopathological markers to identify associations with survival. P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, and the most statistically significant radiomic parameters underwent 3-fold cross-validation. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine independence of prognostic markers.
Results:
49 patients survived the follow up period, with a mean overall survival of 88.4 (± 42.3 months). Univariate analysis showed no significant survival association with clinical variables such as patient sex (p = 0.295), age (p = 0.085), tumour side (p = 0.662), location (p = 0.848) or volume (p = 0.782), or high-risk histopathological metrics including low number lymph node sampling (p = 0.363), perineural, lymphovascular or extramural tumour invasion (p = 0.196), poor tumour differentiation (p = 0.372), and tumour perforation (p = 0.475). No significant survival difference was observed between T3 and T4-stages (p = 0.748). An increased mortality risk was observed for patients with a pixel mean intensity < 20.390 on CT texture (coarse texture scale), HR: 3.40 (1.36-8.49); p = 0.005, and where SUVmax ≥ 25.560 g/mL on [18F]FDG PET/CT, HR: 3.45 (1.31-9.12); p = 0.008. These parameters remained significant after 3-fold cross validation and were independent predictors of survival after Multivariate Cox regression analysis. A higher mortality risk was indicated when the parameters were combined (5 of 66 patients), hazard ratio: 5.44 (1.75-16.91); p = 0.001.
Conclusion:
Multiparametric [18F]FDG PET/CT can potentially provide prognostic markers for patients with stage II colorectal cancer with superior risk stratification compared to T-stage.
More Related Videos
10:04Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a Tool for Studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Treatment in Non-human Primates
Published on: September 5, 2017
10:28Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body being...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
![Quantification of Atherosclerotic Plaque Activity and Vascular Inflammation using [18-F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography FDG-PET/CT](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F3777.jpg&w=3840&q=50)