Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.

Francisco Barcelo1, Carles Escera, Maria J Corral

  • 1Ed. Beatriu de Pinos, University of Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. f.barcelo@uib.es

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|October 4, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rhythmicity and Trait Absorption Are Linked to Nonordinary States of Consciousness.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same author

Neural adaptation in brain responses to vocal and emotional sounds in school-age children.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Bilingual Exposure and Sex Shape Developmental Trajectories of Brain Responses to Speech-Sound Features in Infants.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Neural encoding of speech in noise: Effects of background noise and behavioral correlates.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Measurement properties of the Spanish version of assessment of survivor concerns in cancer patients.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Frequency-Following Response in Infants With Congenital Syphilis.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same journal

Sensorimotor Adaptation of Vocal Pitch Is Impaired in Cerebellar Ataxia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Memory in the Palm of Your Hand: Smartphone-based Methods for Measuring Memory in the Wild.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Processing Asymmetry in Object-modifying Relative Clauses: Evidence from Functional Connectivity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Extensive Experience Remodels Neural Task Circuitry to Escape the Frontal Bottleneck and Increase Automaticity of Categorization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Distilling the Neurophenomenological Signatures of Pure Awareness during Transcendental Meditation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Intentional task switching and distraction by novel stimuli both activate a common brain network for processing novelty. This network, reflected in novelty P3 potentials, is crucial for updating task information and goal-directed action selection.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Novel events capture attention and disrupt ongoing tasks.
  • Intentional task switching also causes behavioral distraction, similar to novelty.
  • A common neural network for processing contextual novelty is hypothesized to underlie both phenomena.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if intentional task switching and novelty-induced distraction share a common neural basis.
  • To explore the role of the novelty P3 potential in attentional control and task set updating.

Main Methods:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in 16 subjects performing card sorting tasks.
  • Two task-cueing paradigms were used: two-task (color/shape) and three-task (color/shape/number).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Novel sound distracters and familiar tonal switch cues were presented, and their effects on ERPs were analyzed.
  • Main Results:

    • Both novel sounds and task-switch cues impaired performance.
    • Novel sounds elicited novelty P3 potentials; task-switch cues elicited similar potentials with frontal negativity.
    • After removing frontal negativity, P3 potentials to novel sounds and task-switch cues showed similar topographies, suggesting shared neural networks.

    Conclusions:

    • Novelty P3 reflects transient activation in a neural network for updating task set information.
    • This network is involved in goal-directed action selection and attentional control.
    • The findings suggest a common neural mechanism for processing contextual novelty in both distraction and task switching.