Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adults' ability to detect children's lying.

Angela M Crossman1, Michael Lewis

  • 1John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

Behavioral Sciences & the Law
|October 4, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Associated With Exposure to Agent Orange.

Cureus·2026
Same author

The long view: Lie-telling trajectories, ages 6 to 19 years.

Development and psychopathology·2026
Same author

Refining the Definition for "Low Risk" in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Time to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality.

JACC. Heart failure·2026
Same author

Practice what you preach? Children's evaluations of parents' verbal messages and social modeling of honesty and lie-telling.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same author

Exosome-Mediated Benefits of Cell Therapy in Mouse and Human Models of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Stem cell reports·2026
Same author

Prediction and Prevention of Delayed Post-polypectomy-induced Ulcer Hemorrhage Based Upon an Anatomic Study and Multivariable Analyses.

Digestive diseases and sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the Adversarial Rivalry: A Developmental Rights-Based Model for Minor-on-Minor Crime, Part 2.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

Current State of Psychological Research on Intimate Partner Violence: Implications for Legal Proceedings.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

A Narrative Review on Juvenile Offense and the Impact and Implications of Internalizing Disorders.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

Behavioral and Cognitive Equivalence Threshold: Foundations for the Practical Extension of Atkins and Roper.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

The Adverse Childhood Experiences Paradigm and Forensic/Correctional Populations: A Scoping Review.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

Front-End Governance of Juvenile Cybercrime in China: Platform Accountability, Risk Mitigation, and Tri-Partite Collaboration.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
See all related articles

Adults struggle to detect deception in children, performing no better than when judging adult lies. Individual differences in detection ability suggest experience with children may be a key factor.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Adults exhibit limited accuracy in detecting deception, even among their peers.
  • Children develop deception skills early, influenced by socialization, yet detecting their lies remains understudied.
  • Individual differences in lie detection abilities are known in adults but less explored in the context of children's veracity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate adult raters' accuracy in discerning truth from deception in children's statements.
  • To examine individual differences in the ability to detect children's lies.
  • To explore the implications of these findings for legal and mental health settings.

Main Methods:

  • Adult participants rated the honesty of children who were instructed to either lie or tell the truth about a misdeed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study analyzed the accuracy of adult judgments in identifying truthful versus deceptive statements made by children.
  • Individual differences among adult raters were assessed in relation to their lie detection performance.

    • Main Results:

    • Adults demonstrated poor accuracy in detecting children's lies, comparable to their performance with adult deception.
    • Adult raters were particularly ineffective at identifying children's truthful statements.
    • Significant individual differences were observed, with experience working with children potentially enhancing detection ability.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings indicate that adults are generally poor lie detectors when assessing children's veracity.
    • Experience with children may be a crucial factor for improving the ability to detect deception in this population.
    • The results have significant implications for legal proceedings and mental health assessments involving children.