Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

12:27
Modified Laparoscopic Anatomic Hepatectomy: Two-Surgeon Technique Combined with the Simple Extracorporeal Pringle Maneuver
Published on: June 16, 2023
Endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: disposable and reusable instruments
1Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Center, Queen Mary Hospital and Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Surgical Technology International
|October 10, 2006
Summary
Reusable instruments offer cost savings for endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP), but disposable options may be safer. Balancing cost, safety, and surgeon experience is key for TEP instrument selection.
Area of Science:
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Instrumentation
- Hernia Repair
Background:
- Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP) is a standard inguinal hernia repair technique.
- TEP often necessitates disposable instruments, contributing to high costs and limiting wider adoption, especially in public healthcare settings.
- The choice between disposable and reusable instruments impacts surgical technique, handling, and patient safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the advantages and disadvantages of reusable versus disposable instruments for TEP procedures.
- To inform the selection of surgical instruments based on procedural costs, operational convenience, patient safety, and surgeon expertise.
- To emphasize the importance of cost-effectiveness and value for money in instrument choice for TEP.
Main Methods:
- Comparative review of disposable and reusable surgical instruments used in TEP.
- Analysis of factors influencing instrument selection, including cost, safety, and surgical technique.
- Discussion of sterilization requirements and potential issues associated with reusable instruments.
Main Results:
- Disposable instruments present a high initial cost, while reusable instruments require sterilization and may experience wear and tear.
- Switching to reusable instruments may necessitate modifications in surgical techniques.
- Both instrument types have distinct handling and safety profiles.
Conclusions:
- The selection of TEP instruments requires a careful balance between procedural cost, operating room logistics, patient safety, and surgeon experience.
- Cost-effectiveness and value for money are critical considerations for both reusable and disposable instruments in TEP.
- Optimizing instrument choice can enhance the broader application of TEP, benefiting more patients.
