Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A road map for creating a Magnet work environment.

Gail A Wolf1, Pamela K Greenhouse

  • 1University of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, UPMC Center for Quality Improvement and Innovation, PA 15261, USA. wolfg@pitt.edu

The Journal of Nursing Administration
|October 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond Magnet® Designation: Perspectives From Nurse Managers on Factors of Sustainability and High-Performance Programming.

The Journal of nursing administration·2016
Same author

Creating Value with the Patient- and Family-Centered Care Methodology and Practice: What Trainees Need to Know, Why, and Strategies for Medical Education.

AMA journal of ethics·2016
Same author

Patient- and Family-Centered Care: A Systematic Approach to Better Ethics and Care.

AMA journal of ethics·2016
Same author

A case for integrating the Patient and Family Centered Care Methodology and Practice in Lean healthcare organizations.

Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2015
Same author

Determining the True Cost to Deliver Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Over the Full Cycle of Care: Preparing for Bundling and Reference-Based Pricing.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2015
Same author

Energy capacity model for nurses: the impact of relaxation and restoration.

The Journal of nursing administration·2015
Same journal

The CNO-CFO Dyad: A Strategic Driver of Organizational Performance.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Elements of Effective Professional Governance: An Integrative Review.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

New Nurse Well-Being: Implications for Retention, Job Satisfaction, and Patient Safety.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Virtual Nursing Programs in Acute Care Settings: A Scoping Review of Patient, Nurse, and System-Level Outcomes.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Occupational Fatigue and Cognitive Performance Among Front-Line Nurse Leaders: The Interplay of Personal and Work Factors.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Resilience and Well-Being Among Nurse Leaders: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness and Narrative Interventions.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
See all related articles

Improving nurse work environments requires focused strategies. Key "Forces of Magnetism" differ by unit developmental level, guiding targeted improvements for higher performance.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Management
  • Organizational Psychology
  • Healthcare Administration

Background:

  • Nurse managers face daily demands requiring effective strategies.
  • Achieving a high-performing, Magnetized work environment is crucial for nursing staff.
  • Identifying specific environmental factors is key to improving healthcare settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the relationship between the working environment and workforce development.
  • To provide a roadmap for creating positive work environments in nursing.
  • To align with the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) Magnet Recognition Program goals.

Main Methods:

  • Administered the American Nursing Association Magnet survey to nurses.
  • Categorized patient units into developmental levels: reactive, responsive, proactive, or high performing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed Forces of Magnetism by unit developmental level using analysis of variance.

    • Main Results:

    • Statistically significant differences in Forces of Magnetism scores were found between unit developmental levels.
    • Organizational structure, management style, and interdisciplinary relations were primary priority forces between reactive and responsive units.
    • Policies and programs, professional models of care, quality of care, consultation and resources, autonomy, and interdisciplinary relations were secondary priority forces between responsive and proactive units.

    Conclusions:

    • Nursing staff perception of the work environment's "Magnetism" varies by unit developmental level.
    • Nurse managers in reactive units should prioritize 3 key Forces of Magnetism for improvement.
    • Units achieving a responsive level should then focus on 6 additional Forces of Magnetism for further development.