Improved detection of rotavirus shedding by polymerase chain reaction

J Wilde1, R Yolken, R Willoughby

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

Lancet (London, England)
|February 9, 1991
PubMed

Insights

A new reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method improves rotavirus detection in infants. RT-PCR identified rotavirus RNA longer and earlier than enzyme immunoassay, aiding in understanding infant rotavirus shedding.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • Rotavirus is a leading cause of gastroenteritis in infants.
  • Accurate and timely detection of rotavirus shedding is crucial for infection control in hospital settings.
  • Current diagnostic methods like enzyme immunoassay may have limitations in detecting prolonged or early viral shedding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for improved identification of rotavirus RNA in infants.
  • To compare the diagnostic performance of RT-PCR with a solid-phase enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detecting rotavirus shedding in hospitalized infants.
  • To assess the duration and onset of rotavirus shedding as detected by both RT-PCR and EIA.

Main Methods:

  • A reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay was developed for rotavirus RNA amplification.
  • The RT-PCR assay was compared against a solid-phase enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for rotavirus detection.
  • Faecal samples from 40 hospitalized infants were analyzed, with a focus on 9 infants with prolonged hospital stays and rotavirus detection.

Main Results:

  • RT-PCR detected rotavirus RNA in 58% of faecal samples, compared to 36% detected by EIA (p < 0.002).
  • The geometric mean duration of rotavirus shedding was significantly longer with RT-PCR (9.5 days) than with EIA (5.7 days) (p < 0.018).
  • RT-PCR identified rotavirus shedding for 2-7 days longer in 5 infants and detected shedding 1 or more days earlier in 4 infants compared to EIA.

Conclusions:

  • RT-PCR is a more sensitive method than EIA for detecting rotavirus RNA in infants, identifying shedding for longer periods and earlier.
  • The enhanced sensitivity of RT-PCR may have implications for understanding rotavirus transmission dynamics in hospital environments.
  • Further research is needed to determine if infants shedding rotavirus detectable only by RT-PCR can transmit the wild-type virus.