Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography.

P Doyle1, C J Martin

  • 1Health Physics, Department of Clinical Physics and Bio-Engineering, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow G12 OXH, UK. philip.doyle@northglasgow.scot.nhs.uk

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|October 19, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A survey of image-guided radiation therapy practices around the globe.

Annals of the ICRP·2026
Same author

The case for individualisation of radiological protection in medicine.

Annals of the ICRP·2026
Same author

The determination of coefficients for size specific effective dose for adult and pediatric patients undergoing routine computed tomography examinations.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2024
Same author

Variations in size-specific effective dose with patient stature and beam width for kV cone beam CT imaging in radiotherapy.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2022
Same author

An international survey of imaging practices in radiotherapy.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2021
Same author

Simplified approach to estimation of organ absorbed doses for patients undergoing abdomen and pelvis CT examination.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2021
Same journal

Effective contrast-enhanced preprocessing for intracranial artery segmentation in digital subtraction angiography.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Improving Plan Quality in Adaptive Proton Therapy Using an Interactive Dose Modification Tool.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Technical Note: Real-Time MLC Control and Latency Measurement Optimization with External Verification.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Fetus-Specific Hematopoietic Stem Cell Dosimetry Framework for Leukemia-Relevant Target Cells During Prenatal Development.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

Automatic exposure control (AEC) devices require calibration for digital radiography systems. This study calibrated AECs for computed radiography (CR) and indirect digital radiography (IDR) using a detector dose indicator (DDI) for consistent image quality.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiological Imaging Technology

Background:

  • Digital radiography detectors have different energy responses compared to traditional screen-film systems.
  • Automatic exposure control (AEC) devices need calibration to maintain consistent image quality across varying tube potentials.
  • Existing calibration methods relying on optical density are unsuitable for digital imaging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the energy responses of computed radiography (CR) and indirect digital radiography (IDR) detectors with screen-film systems.
  • To identify a suitable parameter for AEC calibration in digital radiography.
  • To develop and describe a method for calibrating AEC devices for CR and IDR systems.

Main Methods:

  • Calculated and compared energy responses of CR, IDR, and screen-film systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed CR detector sensitivity variations with tube potential using detector dose indicator (DDI), pixel value, and signal-to-noise ratio.
  • Utilized DDI to determine the kV compensation curve for AEC calibration.
  • Established AEC setup relative to incident air kerma at 80 kV for CR and IDR systems.

    • Main Results:

    • Energy responses of CR and IDR detectors differ from screen-film systems.
    • DDI, pixel value, and signal-to-noise ratio showed consistent variations in CR detector sensitivity with tube potential.
    • A kV compensation curve was determined using DDI to adjust AEC for detector sensitivity loss.
    • A practical method for AEC calibration using the DDI-derived curve was successfully applied.

    Conclusions:

    • AEC calibration is essential for digital radiography to ensure consistent image quality.
    • The detector dose indicator (DDI) provides a reliable parameter for calibrating AEC in CR and IDR systems.
    • The described method allows for accurate AEC setup, compensating for detector energy response variations.