Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Revisiting distinctive processes in memory.

Michael J Cortese1, Jason M Watson, Maya M Khanna

  • 1College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. mcortese@mail.unomaha.edu

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|October 20, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing false memories produced by children and adults in the DRM paradigm: do DRM false memories really increase with age?

Memory (Hove, England)·2025
Same author

Vigorous Exercise Enhances Verbal Fluency Performance in Healthy Young Adults.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

Spelling monosyllabic English words.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023
Same author

Supporting the transition to practice: preceptor behaviors that foster a positive student preceptorship experience.

International journal of nursing education scholarship·2022
Same author

Relating emotional variables to recognition memory performance: a large-scale re-analysis of megastudy data.

Memory (Hove, England)·2022
Same author

The Differential Impact of Mystery in Nature on Attention: An Oculometric Study.

Frontiers in psychology·2021
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

This study found that the number of words similar in sound to a target word (phonological neighborhood size) impacts incidental recall. Processing words with many sound and spelling similarities creates interference, hindering memory.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Incidental recall is influenced by various word properties.
  • Previous research has yielded mixed results regarding orthographic and phonological distinctiveness.
  • Understanding factors affecting memory aids in developing learning strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between orthographic and phonological distinctiveness and incidental recall.
  • To determine how phonological-to-orthographic neighborhood size and consistency affect memory.
  • To clarify conflicting findings in prior memory research.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted involving incidental free recall.
  • Participants read words aloud quickly and accurately.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance was assessed after a surprise free recall test.

    • Main Results:

    • Phonological-to-orthographic neighborhood size significantly influenced recall performance.
    • Orthographic-to-phonological consistency and phonological-to-orthographic consistency did not affect recall.
    • A previously reported orthographic-to-phonological consistency effect could not be replicated and may be confounded.

    Conclusions:

    • Phonological neighborhood size is a key factor in incidental word recall.
    • Processing words with high orthographic and phonological overlap leads to memory interference.
    • These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of memory encoding and retrieval processes.