Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Screw versus cemented implant supported restorations.

W Chee1, S Jivraj2

  • 1Restorative Dentistry, Director of Implant Dentistry at the University of Southern California School of Dentistry / Private Prosthodontics Practitioner, Pasadena, California.

British Dental Journal
|October 24, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Paracetamol prescribing to small animals by veterinarians in Australia and New Zealand.

Australian veterinary journal·2026
Same author

Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Frailty: A Systematic Review.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2018
Same author

Anaesthetic management of a patient with infection-induced acute encephalopathy 3 (IIAE3) who had previously developed an episode of severe encephalopathy following a surgical procedure.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2018
Same author

Endodontics: Gross misinterpretation.

British dental journal·2016
Same author

Obstetric outcome of teenage pregnancies from 2002 to 2008: the Sheffield experience.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2010
Same author

Pregnancy outcome in women with factor V Leiden and recurrent miscarriage.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2009

Screw-retained implant restorations offer advantages over cement-retained options. This article compares both methods for dental implant restorations, focusing on key treatment considerations.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Prosthodontics

Background:

  • Implant-supported restorations can be attached via screws directly to implants or cemented to abutments.
  • Both screw-retained and cement-retained restorations are viable options in implant dentistry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare screw-retained versus cement-retained implant restorations.
  • To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each retention method.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of screw-retained and cement-retained implant restorations.
  • Discussion based on established clinical criteria including aesthetics, retrievability, and long-term planning.

Main Results:

  • Screw-retained restorations are the authors' preferred method.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Detailed comparison across multiple clinical parameters is provided.

    • Conclusions:

    • Screw-retained restorations offer distinct benefits for implant-supported prosthetics.
    • Understanding the trade-offs between retention methods is crucial for optimal patient outcomes.