Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Retrocecal appendix location and perforation at presentation.

Gabriel Herscu1, Allen Kong, Dylan Russell

  • 1University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, USA.

The American Surgeon
|October 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computed tomography staging of colon cancer: improved patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy with combined radiologic tumor and nodal staging.

BMC cancer·2026
Same author

Liver Transplantation After Prolonged Nab-Sirolimus Therapy for Unresectable Hepatic Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumor With Bilobar Involvement.

ACG case reports journal·2026
Same author

EcoFoldDB: Protein Structure-Guided Functional Profiling of Ecologically Relevant Microbial Traits at the Metagenome Scale.

Environmental microbiology·2025
Same author

Risk Factors and Timing of Fasciotomy for Isolated Pediatric Lower Extremity Trauma.

The American surgeon·2025
Same author

Propensity matched analysis of DPA or DPL used within the first hour for severely hypotensive blunt trauma patients.

Surgery open science·2025
Same author

Seed banking impacts native Acacia ulicifolia seed microbiome composition and function.

Environmental microbiome·2025
Same journal

Complete Response of Merkel Cell Carcinoma to Immunotherapy and Single-Fraction Radiotherapy Following Severe COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report and Review of Immune Mechanism.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Perioperative Acute Myocardial Infarction in Non-Cardiac Operations: A National Analysis.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Outcomes of Completion Cholecystectomy: Association With Patient Comorbidity in a National Database.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Building the Conversation: Editorial Stewardship in Contemporary Surgical Publishing.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal Pain in Surgeons on Operating Days.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Splenectomy During Cytoreductive Surgery: Marker of Surgical Burden or Independent Predictor of Morbidity?

The American surgeon·2026
See all related articles

Retrocecal appendicitis, an appendix location behind the cecum, did not show a significant association with perforation at presentation. However, the risk of perforation was 60% higher in this group.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Surgical Pathology

Background:

  • Retrocecal appendicitis is a known anatomical variant.
  • Its clinical course is theorized to be more insidious compared to other appendix locations.
  • Early diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis are crucial to prevent complications like perforation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between retrocecal appendix anatomy and the rate of appendix perforation at presentation.
  • To determine if retrocecal appendicitis leads to a more insidious clinical course.
  • To identify predictors of appendix perforation in adult patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 200 adult patients diagnosed with appendicitis.
  • Analysis of computed tomography (CT) scans to identify retrocecal appendix location and perforation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis including chi-square test and regression analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • No statistically significant association was found between retrocecal appendix anatomy and perforation rates at presentation (P = 0.15).
    • The risk of perforation was 60% higher in the retrocecal group, though not statistically significant.
    • Age and the presence of a fecalith on CT scan were significant predictors of appendix perforation.

    Conclusions:

    • Retrocecal appendix location was not found to be a significant independent predictor of perforation at presentation in this study.
    • Despite a trend towards higher perforation risk, the insidious nature of retrocecal appendicitis was not definitively proven.
    • Further research may be needed to elucidate the clinical implications of retrocecal appendicitis.