Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
Published on: April 1, 2016
Using paired comparisons to create the semantic construct of frequency
1National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Chicago, IL 60601, USA. toneill@ncsbn.org
Abstract:
Using a paired comparison data collection procedure and a one-faceted Rasch model, a stable construct of frequency is derived using 43 non-numeric quantitative descriptors, such as never, almost never, rarely, sometimes, often, etc. This construct is acontextual in that only the words or phrases were compared. The raters were not supplied with any particular context. To make the paired comparison survey more manageable certain assumptions were made that would result in a sparse, but connected 43 x 43 data matrix. Three hundred ninety-six pairs were selected and each pair was assigned to one of two forms. The quality control procedures to detect pair-order effects, fatigue effects, aberrant raters, model misfit, etc. are discussed. The results were mapped onto a continuum, which seems to represent the common understanding of frequency using non-numeric quantitative descriptors. These results have implications for how many different strata of frequency people can reliably differentiate in spoken language. This study can also serve as a primer for using paired comparision data collection procedures with the Rasch model and the methodology can easily be applied to other similar semantic continua. This study used a small sample and the pool of raters was not very diverse, therefore future studies should further consider those issues.
Related Concept Videos
Construction of Frequency Distribution
First, make a table with two columns—one with the title of the data that needs to be organized, and the other column for frequency. [Draw a third column for tally marks if needed]. Then, take a look at the items given in the data set and decide if an ungrouped frequency distribution table or a grouped frequency distribution table would be more suitable. If there are large sets of different values, then it is best to...
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Relative Frequency Histogram
Relative Frequency Distribution
Frequency-dependent Selection
Determination of Expected Frequency

