Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A single system explains human speed perception.

Jeroen J A van Boxtel1, Raymond van Ee, Casper J Erkelens

  • 1Department Physics of Man, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|October 31, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the lateral parietal region on episodic future thinking and episodic memory.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same author

A randomised controlled trial of physical activity and cognitive training in older adults: the PhABHeaD study.

Trials·2026
Same author

Visual noise in augmented reality improves vision in age-related macular degeneration.

npj aging·2026
Same author

Underpinning the impact of in-vehicle distractions on driving performance in Australia.

Journal of safety research·2026
Same author

Qualia structures collapse for geometric shapes, but not faces, when spatial attention is withdrawn.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2025
Same author

Adding noise can reduce response biases in addition to improving perceptual performance.

iScience·2025
Same journal

Sensorimotor Adaptation of Vocal Pitch Is Impaired in Cerebellar Ataxia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Memory in the Palm of Your Hand: Smartphone-based Methods for Measuring Memory in the Wild.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Processing Asymmetry in Object-modifying Relative Clauses: Evidence from Functional Connectivity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Extensive Experience Remodels Neural Task Circuitry to Escape the Frontal Bottleneck and Increase Automaticity of Categorization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Distilling the Neurophenomenological Signatures of Pure Awareness during Transcendental Meditation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Human speed perception is likely processed by a single visual system, not two separate ones for fast and slow speeds. This finding impacts computational models of motion processing.

Area of Science:

  • Visual neuroscience
  • Perceptual psychology

Background:

  • The processing of motion direction is well-understood, but speed perception remains debated.
  • Human psychophysics suggests two systems for fast and slow speeds, while monkey neurophysiology hints at a single system.
  • Existing neurophysiological data is limited and may not fully capture potential separate anatomical systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the number of systems involved in human speed perception.
  • To reconcile conflicting evidence between human psychophysics and animal neurophysiology.
  • To provide a unified model for human speed processing.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted three psychophysical motion adaptation experiments.
  • Applied computational modeling to analyze experimental data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared results with predictions from the two-motion system hypothesis.

    • Main Results:

    • Experimental data did not support the predictions of the two-motion system hypothesis.
    • Both new and existing data are consistent with a single system for human speed perception.
    • The findings challenge the notion of separate systems for fast and slow speed processing.

    Conclusions:

    • Human speed perception is best explained by a single, unified system.
    • This challenges previous models and suggests a re-evaluation of motion processing organization.
    • The results have significant implications for understanding visual motion computation.