Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Processing bare quantifiers in discourse.

Edith Kaan1, Andrea C Dallas, Christopher M Barkley

  • 1Linguistics, University of Florida, P.O. Box 115454, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. kaan@ufl.edu

Brain Research
|October 31, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing Brain Responses to Moral and Semantic Violations.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Investigating the effects of code-switch types on cognitive control.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

How domain-general proactive control modulates the processing of English wh-dependencies: An EEG study.

Brain and language·2025
Same author

Access to verb bias and plausibility information during syntactic processing in adult Spanish-English bilinguals.

Bilingualism (Cambridge, England)·2022
Same author

Oscillatory brain responses to processing code-switches in the presence of others.

Brain and language·2022
Same author

Understanding counterfactuals in transparent and nontransparent context: An event-related potential investigation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2021
Same journal

IGFBP3 and UBE2C are associated with protein modification pathways and serve as prognostic markers in glioma.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Targeting neurodevelopmental miR132-3p promotes neuroprotection and axon regeneration after optic nerve injury in mice.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Variability in acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition across adulthood in Fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 knockout mice.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Transcriptome-guided modeling reveals insulin-related metabolic dysfunction in SCA3 mouse cerebellum.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Intranasal stromal cell-derived factor-1α mitigates parkinsonian deficits via dual modulation of neuroinflammation and gut microbiota in MPTP-induced models.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Emotions, the amygdala, and the right hemisphere.

Brain research·2026
See all related articles

Readers update their mental models using bare quantifiers, like "two." Ambiguous quantifiers trigger context updates, with some readers showing unique brain responses, indicating individual differences in language processing.

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Background:

  • Readers construct and update mental representations of discourse.
  • Bare quantifiers (e.g., 'two') present interpretation challenges due to ambiguity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the cognitive processes and neural correlates of bare quantifier interpretation.
  • Examine how the discourse model is constructed and modified during incremental sentence processing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to measure brain activity.
  • Conducted a sentence completion study to analyze quantifier interpretation preferences.
  • Analyzed ERPs in response to unambiguous quantifiers signaling new referents.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • A late positive component (900-1500 ms), interpreted as a Late Positive Complex, was associated with context updating.
  • An earlier positivity (500-700 ms) was observed in a subset of participants, suggesting individual differences.
  • The subset interpretation of bare quantifiers appears to be preferred.

    • Conclusions:

    • Bare quantifiers require dynamic discourse model updating.
    • ERP data reveal neural correlates of context updating and individual differences in quantifier interpretation.
    • Findings contribute to understanding incremental language processing and cognitive flexibility.