Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026
Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
Transmetatarsal amputation: assessment of current selection criteria
Thomas Anthony1, James Roberts, J Gregory Modrall
1Section of General Surgery, Surgical Service, VA North Texas Health Care System, 4500 S Lancaster Rd, Dallas, TX 75216, USA. Thomas.anthony@UTSouthwestern.edu
Background:
Transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) is an operation designed to remove a limited area of irremediable tissue ischemia and/or infection and preserve limb function. Patients are selected for TMA based on degree of tissue loss/infection, adequacy of tissue perfusion at the transmetatarsal level, current ambulatory status, and estimation of the likelihood of postprocedure ambulation. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of these selection criteria.
Methods:
An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was conducted of all patients undergoing TMA from January 1, 1997, until January 1, 2006. Information was collected on patient demographics, medical comorbidity, and clinical and surgical variables. Outcome measures included the proportion of patients requiring amputation revision to a more proximal level and ambulatory status at last follow-up.
Results:
Fifty-two TMAs were performed. In 35 procedures, the skin was left open, and in 17 TMA was closed primarily. Primary indications for the procedure were vascular insufficiency or infection in 50 of 52 patients, whereas 2 patients required amputation for malignancy. The majority (46/52, 89%) of patients were diabetic. After the index TMA, 85 additional operations were required. Only 9 patients (18%) underwent a single operation. Revision of the TMA to a more proximal level was required in 29 of 52 (56%) patients, resulting in 4 Syme, 20 transtibial, and 5 transfemoral amputations. Non-insulin-dependent diabetes was associated with an increased likelihood of revision to a more proximal amputation (odds ratio [OR] = 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-24). At the time of last follow-up (median 18 months), 37 of 50 (74%) patients were ambulatory (83% for TMAs and 67% for more proximal amputations, P = 0.18). Prior vascular procedures were associated with a significantly decreased likelihood of ambulation (OR = 14; 95% CI, 1.9-103).
Conclusions:
Although most patients retain the ability to ambulate after TMA, multiple operations should be anticipated in the majority of patients and revision of a TMA to a more proximal level may be required. These data suggest that current selection criteria for TMA may be inadequate.
