Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking.

Ajay N Jain1

  • 1UCSF Cancer Research Institute, Department of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0218, USA. ajain@jainlab.org

Current Protein & Peptide Science
|November 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CSCAN: Conformational Analysis of Macrocyclic Peptides through NMR Chemical Shifts.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Structure-based pose prediction: Non-cognate docking extended to macrocyclic ligands.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2024
Same author

From UK-2A to florylpicoxamid: Active learning to identify a mimic of a macrocyclic natural product.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2024
Same author

Correction: Complex peptide macrocycle optimization: combining NMR restraints with conformational analysis to guide structure-based and ligand-based design.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2024
Same author

Complex peptide macrocycle optimization: combining NMR restraints with conformational analysis to guide structure-based and ligand-based design.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2023
Same author

Unmasking the True Identity of Rapamycin's Minor Conformer.

Journal of natural products·2023
Same journal

Therapeutic Peptides as Targeting Vectors and Smart Therapeutics: Emerging Trends and Future Perspectives.

Current protein & peptide science·2026
Same journal

Innovative Protein Nanostructures and Hybrid Systems for Enhanced Encapsulation and Controlled Delivery of Bioactive Agents.

Current protein & peptide science·2026
Same journal

Nanotherapeutic Interventions in Diabetic Wound Healing: Biomarker- Guided Mechanisms and Translational Prospects.

Current protein & peptide science·2026
Same journal

Recent developments in intein-mediated protein splicing and their applications in bioengineering.

Current protein & peptide science·2026
Same journal

Amyloids of Food Proteins: Balancing Benefits and Risks.

Current protein & peptide science·2026
Same journal

Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Path to Cognitive Rescue.

Current protein & peptide science·2026
See all related articles

Molecular docking uses scoring functions for drug discovery. While good at predicting ligand location, these functions struggle to accurately rank true drug candidates, impacting screening utility.

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery and development
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Virtual screening using molecular docking is a key method for identifying and refining drug leads.
  • Docking algorithms rely on scoring functions and search methods to predict ligand-protein interactions.
  • Scoring function performance is critical for the success of molecular docking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the two primary theoretical aspects of scoring function performance: location and magnitude.
  • To evaluate how these aspects influence docking accuracy and screening utility.
  • To discuss strategies for improving scoring function performance, particularly in ranking true ligands.

Main Methods:

  • The study theoretically analyzes the performance of scoring functions in molecular docking.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It differentiates between 'location performance' (pose prediction accuracy) and 'magnitude performance' (scoring accuracy).
  • The impact of these performances on docking accuracy and screening utility is examined.

    • Main Results:

    • Scoring functions generally perform well in predicting the correct ligand pose (location performance).
    • However, performance varies widely in accurately estimating the binding affinity or score (magnitude performance).
    • While effective for enriching true ligands in screening, current functions often fail to accurately rank bona fide ligands.

    Conclusions:

    • Location performance is crucial for docking accuracy, while magnitude performance dictates screening utility and scoring accuracy.
    • Improvements in scoring functions are needed to enhance their ability to rank true ligands effectively.
    • Further strategies are discussed to address the limitations in magnitude estimation for molecular docking scoring functions.